Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Scandals are important parts of our lives. They try to warn us regarding current problems. Some people think that scandals are harmful to us and can reduce our performance; others disagree. In my view, they could be useful to us and help us improve ourselves, however, sometime they could be detrimental rather than beneficial for three important reasons.
First, the main reason in support of the claim that scandals are useful to us is that they have enough experience regarding that particular situation so they can inform us better than others. For instance, each person has a certain duties and do his best to succeed. During this period, he or she may face some problems regarding his career, school works or etc. these scandals have seen this situation or similar one and know that how the person can solve this problem and what he will encounter as the result of his mistake.
In addition, they do not hesitate to express their opinion regarding weaknesses and strengths. For example, Consider a family member or a friend wants to express his point of view concerning your performance. They may provide false information because they try to say points that they think we approve of. These comments will not be beneficial.
However, if scandals just try to focus on negative points, they could be detrimental to the individuals. A good scandal must present his point of view in both positive and negative sides. Illustrating weak points can help people improve themselves and they can solve them, on the other hand, expressing positive points encourage people strengthen these aspects. Knowing both aspects of our activity can lead to an increase in overall performance.
In sum, some people may believe that scandal just hurt people while I think that they are more beneficial rather than detrimental. Not only they have enough experience but they can also express their view without any disposition. Scandals should consider this important point that encouraging and expressing negative points are both vital to reform people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- “Over the past year, our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station’s coverage of l 70
- Topic 3: Nowadays, food has become easier to prepare. Has this change improved the way people food? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Butter has now been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States. Only about 2 percent of customers have complained, indicating that 98 people out of 100 are happy with the change. Furthermore, many se 58
- Homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last year that region experienced twenty days with below-average temperatures, and local weather forecasters throughout 50
- Topic 1 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s situation or similar one and know that how the person can solve this problem an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, so, then, while, for example, for instance, i think, in addition, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 56.0 33.0505617978 169% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12537313433 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61599855304 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528358208955 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5292469026 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.3684210526 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6315789474 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47368421053 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214458712397 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0694196901592 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513180616051 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12534432564 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309353302624 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.