There is no doubt that everyone is looking for the best job. However, it is where the agreement stops. When talking about the controversial question whether waiting for a satisfying job or taking a secure job offer, people have different opinions. Personally, I prefer to take the secure job right away. I make this statement based on my own experience, and the reasons are because waiting for a gratifying job is unreliable and a secure job helps us make a great fortune soon. More detail supporting my statement is illustrated below.
To begin with, wasting time to waiting for a satisfying job is unreliable. The job market is more competitive than the past, so it is hard to find a decent job. According to a research, 30 percent of Ph.D. students cannot find a job even those who major in a popular field such as computer science. Time is so hard, so waiting for another job is unreliable. The vivid example is me. When I graduated from graduate school, I went into the dilemma whether to accept the offer of the biggest IC design house, MTK, in Taiwan and work as a signal algorithm developer or to wait for Google, the most popular software company in the world. At that time, I was more interested in working as a software developer in Google, but despite the interviewer in Google had said that I had a very high chance to get the job, I had been waiting for 10 days. Finally, I decided to work in MTK. Two days after I started working in MTK, I got a message from Google that I failed the interview. I was so glad that I took the secure job and begun to work; otherwise, I might have a hard time to find another decent job because of a hard time of the job markets.
Moreover, taking a secure job means starting to making money now. Some people may argue that the secure job does not satisfy their ambition and see it as not successful. However, in my perspective, making a lot of fortune as soon as possible is successful. Rather than searching or waiting for a suitable job, by accepting the secure job people can start working and making money. Take myself for example again, thanks to the decision I made to take a secure job immediately, I had a longer period of working experience than other peers. The longer time of experience helps me get more opportunities to be promoted and to get salary increment. As a result, my salary is 1.5 times more than my classmates after we graduated for three years. Therefore, it is no doubt that I will save a great fortune sooner than my classmates.
In sum, based on the explanation I mentioned, I think it is much safer to take the secure job since the job market is competitive.
- It is more important for universities to invest in infrastructure and physical plant than to invest in keeping the faculty satisfied. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 21 integrated 76
- It’s difficult for teachers to be both popular (well liked) and effective in helping students learn. Agree or disagree? 70
- TPO 45 integrated
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication, such as letters, email, or telephone calls. Use specific reasons and details to support your answer. 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, for example, i think, no doubt, such as, talking about, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 43.0788530466 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2157.0 1977.66487455 109% => OK
No of words: 481.0 407.700716846 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48440748441 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64609354003 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476091476091 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6003584229 121% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3577188631 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.28 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.24 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 11.8709677419 160% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360722886307 0.236089414692 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109593807118 0.076458572812 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768771123886 0.0737576698707 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236062785656 0.150856017488 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758388880783 0.0645574589148 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 11.7677419355 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.7 10.9000537634 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 86.8835125448 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.