Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this few of the last years, young people tend to apathy for their surrounding environment. This case brings some school to add in social activity in their curriculum except the academic subject. In my view, the unpaid community should be a mandatory aspect of school’s rule. In this text, I will examine about my meaningful thought on this issue and talk some notice if the idea will be applied in junior high school.
First and the foremost, the most convincing opinion if social activity must be a school’s rule, surely it can grow the student’s social awareness. Some activities such as disaster volunteering educate the youth to be helpful and independent people. They will see the real environment. It can be great beginning before they graduate and face the real society where will they live so they will not get a startle when taking in the living hood.
Secondly, the additional opinion is a little social action doing by youth is affect to the social welfare. For example, building and creating mini catching library in one area is essential to the education sector because the library shall interest the children to read books pleasantly. If the citizen has a development education and knowledge, it must be increasing the social welfare too.
Adjusting the social community to school’s activity takes more advantages. But, the school required to managing the schedule, because of in this last years, the country prone to give more priority in the academic subject like math and science, although the non-cognitive is taking an essential part too to national development. The school has to balance the schedule. And it can be better if the student doing the social activity, not for the school command only.
To sum up, the idea to add it to the curriculum is taking more plus point than its drawback. Creating social welfare is the obligation for all the part. Besides of that, the other thing like school’s schedule managing is required to tackle professionally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Jass Rai | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | rahulsd | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Harf | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children) To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children)To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmers (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children) To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion? 73
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ere will they live so they will not get a startle when taking in the living hood. Sec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g is required to tackle professionally.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, such as, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07530120482 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82888096231 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539156626506 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6222088089 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6111111111 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.38888888889 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168327229998 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586925358421 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452561926519 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942413094099 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422729443898 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.