Claitown University needs both affordable housing for its students and a way to fund the building of such housing. The best solution to this problem is to commission a famous architect known for experimental and futuristic buildings. It is common knowledge that tourists are willing to pay money to tour some of the architect's buildings, so it can be expected that tourists will want to visit this new building. The income from the fees charged to tourists will soon cover the building costs. Furthermore, such a building will attract new students as well as donations from alumni. And even though such a building will be much larger than our current need for student housing, part of the building can be used as office space.
Claitown University needs affordable housing for the student and a way to fund the building of such housing. The best solution according to the university personals is to hire a known architect known for his designs for futuristic buildings. The problem that arises here is how many students needs to be accommodated in the building? If the number of students staying on-campus is less as compared to students opting for cheap housing off-campus, apparently, there is no use of investing in an entire building.
Also, hiring a famous architect, and he/she being erudite of his field, the consulting fees and the materials the architect will be using will be very high. Again, the university will be in debt for the fees, the costing of the material used in the building, contractor and labor charges and then after the building is constructed there will be maintenance charges also. One cannot rely on the architect for the tourist attraction. Tourist will not be attracted only with the design of the building but also with the amenities and other recreational facilities around the building. The building being constructed for the student housing, if its made in keeping tourist attraction in mind, it will be a major disturbance for the students in the building and hinder their privacy because of constant visitors in and around building.
There is no proper paper work or calculation that says that limited fees for the tourist will cover the humongous charge for construction and maintenance of the building. For, the tourist to visit the building and pay for visiting, the building has to be extra ordinary and has to be an architectural charisma. For example, no person will pay for a visit of a student housing building unless it has a big bean like the one in Chicago around it. People pay for visit the places such as Leaning tower of Pisa and collossium in Rome. For student housing, the building should be, even if, a tourist attraction when it's a semester or annual break for the students. Although, even if the building is not an architectural attraction, recreational and other sports facilities inside and outside the building will surely bring some visitors. Other school kids and university students can come and pay and participate in the activities exclusively held in the building.
On the other hand, receiving money from the alumni is not a bad option but again the entire building cannot be constructed depending on the funds received from the alumni. Again, The article fails to mention the solid about of money that can be expected from the alumni. What if the desired amount is not received, there is a possibility that all the expenses will come ultimately on the students who shall be opting for the housing in the building. New students will only be attracted for opting for housing in the new building if the university provides all the basic student facilities in a package that is cheaper than any other nearby housing.
The need for a larger building will also cover need of an office space. But again, an office space in a building will be a kind of distraction for the students in the building and hinder of their privacy because of the visitors in the office ares. Construction of cheap housing got students is not a bad idea, but making is an architectural phenomenon that will be a waste without a proper planning, is surely a bad idea. A student needs basic facilities, a good mess and a housing closer to university, provide them that and they will be ready to pay more in the next year of their accommodation for the housing.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-01 | Primace | 58 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | liakath96 | 55 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | goelchirag21 | 83 | view |
| 2019-07-06 | goelchirag21 | 83 | view |
| 2019-02-08 | mmgangrade | 89 | view |
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could. 58
- Some parents forbid young children from owning smartphones (cell phones with Internet access), while others disagree and believe that they are important tools for keeping in touch. Which point of view do you think is better, and why? 60
- Claitown University needs both affordable housing for its students and a way to fund the building of such housing. The best solution to this problem is to commission a famous architect known for experimental and futuristic buildings. It is common knowledg 89
- Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world First solar energy eliminates our reliance on non renewable fossil fuels Additionally solar energy is non pollutant which makes it better for everyone Finally there is almos 91
- Do you agree with the following statement? Good teachers are more important to a child's development than good parents. Use specific details to support your argument. 60
Comments
Essay evaluation report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 24 15
No. of Words: 613 350
No. of Characters: 2903 1500
No. of Different Words: 240 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.976 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.736 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.674 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 204 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 161 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 113 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 60 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.542 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.692 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.625 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.348 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.532 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.133 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...r of students staying on-campus is less as compared to students opting for cheap h...
^^
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
..., hiring a famous architect, and he/she being erudite of his field, the consulting fe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ucted there will be maintenance charges also. One cannot rely on the architect for t...
^^^^
Line 5, column 612, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... be, even if, a tourist attraction when its a semester or annual break for the stud...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, if, so, then, as to, for example, kind of, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.6327345309 168% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.9520958084 178% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 11.1786427146 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 28.8173652695 76% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 55.5748502994 121% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 16.3942115768 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2969.0 2260.96107784 131% => OK
No of words: 612.0 441.139720559 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85130718954 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.97379470361 4.56307096286 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74168156133 2.78398813304 98% => OK
Unique words: 247.0 204.123752495 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.403594771242 0.468620217663 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 921.6 705.55239521 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 15.0 8.76447105788 171% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.8473053892 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5054750979 57.8364921388 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.708333333 119.503703932 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.324526521 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.70786347227 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339625360868 0.218282227539 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133067706835 0.0743258471296 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116681995045 0.0701772020484 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240139280394 0.128457276422 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135047425746 0.0628817314937 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.3799401198 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.3550499002 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.197005988 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.5979740519 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 98.500998004 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.1389221557 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.