The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore, a chain of video rental stores.
“In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits, we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore’s ten video rental stores. Since we are famous for our special bargains, raising our rental prices is not a viable way to improve profits. Last month our store in downtown Marston significantly decreased its operating expenses by closing at 6:00 P.M. rather than 9:00 P.M. and by reducing its stock by eliminating all movies released more than five years ago. Therefore, in order to increase profits without jeopardizing our reputation for offering great movies at low prices, we recommend implementing similar changes in our other nine Movies Galore stores.”
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be addressed in order to decide whether implementing the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result and explain how the answers to those questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Here the most vitally surgent question is:
The recent decrease in the operating costs did increase the profits or not? If yes, in doing so, were their reputation for dedication towards client’s service be compromised?
It is unequivocally proved from the question that the stores if closed 3 hours earlier did curtail the price. However, what is required to be captured with crucial interests, and then addressed is whether the time short circuited is peak hours or not. Because if the sales are relatively greater in those three hours, then as per argument it seemingly appears to curtail the expenses, however, factually compromise the any what unemphatic but vital those are the large scores of sales as well as the numbers of customers. The preceded operating costs might or might not be really from the working hours and extinguishing the older video rental content, besides the entire emphasis for relevance appears largely non-obviously.
Elimination of the stock which is five years or even older, might or might not, surprisingly reduce the extra material and aptly vacate the space for newer, but, simultaneously to buy, arrange, display, and incorporate new material would also be same or even more expensive, even so costlier, at the greater expense of losing those particularly enthusiastic customers specifically attracted toward inventory of older genres of videos.
But a question pressingly incurred is that would it be an adroitly wise and expertly genial way of decision to close the store at just 6 pm where the main gaiety is assumingly in and after the period of indicated time. Even as per chance, assuming that changes in that store induced an overall profit and enrichment of material, hence enhancement of store charming elegancy and allusivity for movie customers, it will still be largely questionable as to lending the similar conditional grounds for modifications will lead towards the similar results, as it might be a scenario that Galore store in downtown and residents have in characteristically perceived sense of demographically, logistically and geographically instilling taste, may be intensely different as being located in downtown. It is verily logically that other stores of same chain would not be adjoint to it. Residents habituating in downtown, are most probably younger, might have enthusiastically built tastes for new genres of movies and would be concurrently befitted to the science fictions and similarly developed tastes which almost always are released and enlisted no older than few years. But the even presumably attempted goal of profit might not absolutely be accomplishable where there are older people and hence largely evading new and profoundly interested in old stuffs, like way back than five years. However, they might like to retrieve back to homes at evening unlike the crowded downtown habitants.
The practicality of the claim even in its as partial implementations, remains largely vulnerable to the sharp relief of the variations and contradictions, mainly posed by the very claim itself due to the implicitly implied weak assumptions on which it lent its foundation and hence as such fail to convincingly put forward its practicality.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | shubham1102 | 66 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Priata Saha | 60 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | KnockingOn | 68 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | akin | 63 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | sky97gill | 62 | view |
- CLAIM The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones INSTRUCTIONS Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 50
- CLAIM Men and Women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks INSTRUCTIONS Writing a response to which extent we agree or disagree while addressing the most compelling reasons and examples that can be used challe 50
- Claim 16
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as muc 66
- Argument Owning to the risk and cost human travel to space must be terminated instead must be used what are known as unmanned aircrafts 40
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 4.0 out of 6
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 509 350
No. of Characters: 2650 1500
No. of Different Words: 281 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.75 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.206 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.984 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 190 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 155 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 106 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 72 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 33.933 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 18.863 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.867 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.293 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.44 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.046 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 5
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, hence, however, if, may, really, similarly, so, still, then, thus, well, as to, even so, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.6327345309 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 11.1786427146 233% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 11.0 13.6137724551 81% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 55.5748502994 94% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2712.0 2260.96107784 120% => OK
No of words: 509.0 441.139720559 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32809430255 5.12650576532 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.56307096286 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0491083183 2.78398813304 110% => OK
Unique words: 291.0 204.123752495 143% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571709233792 0.468620217663 122% => OK
syllable_count: 857.7 705.55239521 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.96107784431 81% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.67365269461 239% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 19.7664670659 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.8473053892 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 137.951854956 57.8364921388 239% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.714285714 119.503703932 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.3571428571 23.324526521 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 5.70786347227 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.20758483034 122% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119903584228 0.218282227539 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.041990756041 0.0743258471296 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373411801073 0.0701772020484 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0450924897657 0.128457276422 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391659771837 0.0628817314937 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.9 14.3799401198 152% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.48 48.3550499002 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.1628742515 181% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.5 12.197005988 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.23 12.5979740519 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.32208582834 125% => OK
difficult_words: 160.0 98.500998004 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 12.3882235529 89% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 11.1389221557 147% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.9071856287 109% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.