CLAIM:
The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
INSTRUCTIONS:
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teaching at wherever place and time, at whenever stage of life of learner, to be fruitful, always required to be comprised of the strategic approach towards the learner, towards whom the teachings are directed, in which the teacher must always best care not to hurt the inwardly feelings and delicate emotions of learner, no matter how old or at which stage is the learner, unless the circumstances clearly called for such bold actions, for example criminals should be undoubtedly treated in line with the latter approach.
The abovementioned recommendations, if fully acted upon, can engender certain mental learning attitudes which are partly not as fruitful, or some times more precisely, even counter-productive and hence not successful as otherwise could be. Firstly, the methodology can be negatively construed by the learner or may be learners(typically at the college level), subsequent outcomes may be nasty if there are no reprimands and punishments for the negative actions, which characteristically and demonstrably negatively influence the other people around, and which they should not, making a working place that, for problematic person presence, would have been better without. One manifestly relevant example could be of the student negatively influencing other students if left unaddressed, could be recipe for disaster not just for present but as elaborately said a child is father of man, therefore, even so, egregiously in the future; while here, clinging to addressing him by admonitory or punitive actions would probably have long lasting positive impacts on not just congenial to the environment but also whatever would be the organizations dealing with that student down the timeline. However, it must not be misinterpreted as not being one’s acerbic words seeing the student or learner overall psychology and sensitivity, as it might be that reprimanding for the negative actions counter-produce against what is already tuned positively, especially in particular cases when the sensitivity is mainly there.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-18 | muhammadhanzlamunir | 50 | view |
- Claim 16
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the owner of Movies Galore a chain of video rental stores In order to reverse the recent decline in our profits we must reduce operating expenses at Movies Galore s ten video rental stores Since we are famous fo 67
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as muc 66
- Argument Owning to the risk and cost human travel to space must be terminated instead must be used what are known as unmanned aircrafts 40
- CLAIM Men and Women because of their inherent physical differences are not equally suited for many tasks INSTRUCTIONS Writing a response to which extent we agree or disagree while addressing the most compelling reasons and examples that can be used challe 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, while, even so, for example, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 33.0505617978 21% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 58.6224719101 49% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 312.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52884615385 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22744633503 2.79657885939 115% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61858974359 0.4932671777 125% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 20.2370786517 25% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 62.0 23.0359550562 269% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 109.939255955 60.3974514979 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 345.0 118.986275619 290% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 62.4 23.4991977007 266% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 21.8 5.21951772744 418% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.97078651685 40% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127440351136 0.243740707755 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698284536926 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023747010773 0.0758088955206 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099805657532 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128812479149 0.0667264976115 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 35.8 14.1392134831 253% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 0.09 48.8420337079 0% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 17.1 7.92365168539 216% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 28.7 12.1743820225 236% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.68 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.72 8.38706741573 140% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.8971910112 235% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 26.8 11.2143820225 239% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 29.0 11.7820224719 246% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.