In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge
The statement claim that the imagination is more important than knowledge in the field of academic and other professions. I disagree with this statement insofar as knowledge is the primary element to imagine on particular topic. Without deep knowledge on the topic, it is not possible to think and imagine on the topic. And imagination is more likely invalid other than the expert's imagination. However, sometimes general person's imagination on a particular topic open an innovative idea and it help to rethink from different perspective.
First compelling argument in favor of my position is to think and imagine on a particular topic, knowledge is the raw material. Without the basic knowledge on this area it is hard to think because he do not know the basic mechanism. For example, in the area of electrical engineering, without knowledge on electrical engineering, general people never imagine on a particular topic because he have not a minimum knowledge on this. Even except expert, any person, know the basic in the area of electrical engineering, can not think or imagine. Because it is esoteric for all.
Another argument is without the knowledge, imagination is more likely invalided. Because this imagination have not any value to the society as he is not an expert on this. For example, if general person think on the quantum physics then his imagination is less likely to acceptable to all.
Moreover, deep knowledge is the main thing that foster for imagination on the topic. After gain knowledge properly on any area then it evoke to think on the problems and that foster to imagine to solve this.
However, sometimes imagination on any particular area help to foster gain knowledge and make a person more passionate on this area. Imagination also can open the door of innovation and think from different perspective. In some cases, in the field of academic imagination is more important than knowledge to develop the critical thinking abilities.
In conclusion, Knowledge is more important than imagination in the field of academic and others as proper knowledge is the raw material to imagine and without proper knowledge, mostly imagination is invalided. But it is not true that knowledge is the only stage to imagine. Imaginations in academic can foster to be passionate and enhance the deep learning capability. So imagination and knowledge both are important in any field. The combination of knowledge and imagination can help to reach to the better solution.
- Claim Colleges and universities should specify all required courses and eliminate elective courses in order to provide clear guidance for students Reason College students like people in general prefer to follow directions rather than make their own decisi 66
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Claim Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Reason We are not able to make connections between current events and past events until we have some distance from both Write a response in which you discuss the extent to w 58
- The graph below shows the average retirement age of males and females in six countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the average retirement age of males and females in six countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...n is more likely invalid other than the experts imagination. However, sometimes general...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...imagination. However, sometimes general persons imagination on a particular topic open...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion. However, sometimes general persons imagination on a particular topic open a...
^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...ar topic open an innovative idea and it help to rethink from different perspective. ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...his area it is hard to think because he do not know the basic mechanism. For examp...
^^
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...magine on a particular topic because he have not a minimum knowledge on this. Even e...
^^^^
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'minimum knowledge'.
Suggestion: minimum knowledge
... a particular topic because he have not a minimum knowledge on this. Even except expert, any person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'evokes'?
Suggestion: evokes
... knowledge properly on any area then it evoke to think on the problems and that foste...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine solving'.
Suggestion: imagine solving
...hink on the problems and that foster to imagine to solve this. However, sometimes imagination o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 16.3942115768 152% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 405.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14074074074 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96295884773 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.367901234568 0.468620217663 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2652267793 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5217391304 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6086956522 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.70786347227 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426371540461 0.218282227539 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159021836194 0.0743258471296 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158798668372 0.0701772020484 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268362068895 0.128457276422 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159792028743 0.0628817314937 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.3550499002 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'experts'' or 'expert's'?
Suggestion: experts'; expert's
...n is more likely invalid other than the experts imagination. However, sometimes general...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...imagination. However, sometimes general persons imagination on a particular topic open...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 430, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion. However, sometimes general persons imagination on a particular topic open a...
^^
Line 1, column 497, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
...ar topic open an innovative idea and it help to rethink from different perspective. ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 201, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'does'.
Suggestion: does
...his area it is hard to think because he do not know the basic mechanism. For examp...
^^
Line 2, column 393, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...magine on a particular topic because he have not a minimum knowledge on this. Even e...
^^^^
Line 2, column 402, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'minimum knowledge'.
Suggestion: minimum knowledge
... a particular topic because he have not a minimum knowledge on this. Even except expert, any person...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 135, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'evokes'?
Suggestion: evokes
... knowledge properly on any area then it evoke to think on the problems and that foste...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine solving'.
Suggestion: imagine solving
...hink on the problems and that foster to imagine to solve this. However, sometimes imagination o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, for example, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.6327345309 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.9520958084 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 11.1786427146 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 13.6137724551 29% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 28.8173652695 80% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 55.5748502994 112% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 16.3942115768 152% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2082.0 2260.96107784 92% => OK
No of words: 405.0 441.139720559 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14074074074 5.12650576532 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48604634366 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96295884773 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 204.123752495 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.367901234568 0.468620217663 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 705.55239521 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 2.0 8.76447105788 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 19.7664670659 116% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.8473053892 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.2652267793 57.8364921388 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5217391304 119.503703932 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6086956522 23.324526521 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.70786347227 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.15768463074 116% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.25449101796 171% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.20758483034 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.426371540461 0.218282227539 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159021836194 0.0743258471296 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158798668372 0.0701772020484 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.268362068895 0.128457276422 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159792028743 0.0628817314937 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 48.3550499002 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.5979740519 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.32208582834 88% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 98.500998004 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 12.3882235529 73% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.1389221557 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.