Topic: The following is from a memo from the advertising director of the Super screen Movie Production Company.According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any

Essay topics:

Topic: The following is from a memo from the advertising director of the Super screen Movie Production Company.
According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than in any other year. And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super screen movies actually increased during the past year. Clearly, the contents of these reviews are not reaching enough of our prospective viewers. Thus, the problem lies not with the quality of our movies but with the public’s lack of awareness that movies of good quality are available. Super screen should therefore allocate a greater share of its budget next year to reaching the public through advertising.

In this argument, the memo claims that since the public attended fewer movies with a super screen-produced, and the positive views about the super screen movies was actually raising, then the problem of the unpopular of it must be the anawareness of the good quality of the movies. Thus, the author reached a conclusion that The super screen should share a greater budget to advertise. however, before reaching the final conclusion of the argument, there are several questions that should be answered before the implement of the recommendation.

First and foremost, I need to assure the accuracy of the report. The author cites a recent report from marketing department which shows a decrease of the people choose super screen-produced movies, and the positive reviews of it increased. however, the author does not talk about the catologies of people included in teh report, which may lead to a diavate of the result.

In addition, we also do not know whether the movie reviewers opinion can represent the public. people review a movie maybe just because they really like it, or, maybe they want to attribute more money for the movie. In these circumstances, the report does not clearly list the population of the reviewers, which will undermine the conclusion if it turns out it just interview a few groups of the people and they cannot represent the whole group of the audience.

Last but not least, how do we now that the public do not see the super screen just because of unawarness but do not have other reasons. the author cites people do not attend super screen movies because they do not know it. however, there is no evidence shows that people's dismiss is because of unawarness. it is highly possible that the audience are most students and they do not have enough more to afford the tickets. In this case, the author's conclusion will be partly undermined since they do know about the Sreen and no matter how hard they advertise, it will not draw more people.

In sum, before the questions above can be answered, we cannot just reach the final conclusion that greater budgets for advertising is a wise advice.

Votes
Average: 2.3 (3 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-17 hexa 42 view
2019-11-11 chapagain08 47 view
2019-10-27 kevlarpeng 55 view
2019-10-26 gutta prudhvi 77 view
2019-10-12 shekhawat2407 30 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user zetton :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 387, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...ld share a greater budget to advertise. however, before reaching the final conclusion o...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...d the positive reviews of it increased. however, the author does not talk about the cat...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 96, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...ewers opinion can represent the public. people review a movie maybe just because they ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...awarness but do not have other reasons. the author cites people do not attend super...
^^^
Line 7, column 307, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...oples dismiss is because of unawarness. it is highly possible that the audience ar...
^^
Line 7, column 439, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...o afford the tickets. In this case, the authors conclusion will be partly undermined si...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 135, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'wise advice'.
Suggestion: wise advice
...that greater budgets for advertising is a wise advice.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, may, really, so, then, thus, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.6327345309 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.9520958084 93% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 11.1786427146 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 13.6137724551 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 28.8173652695 101% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 55.5748502994 72% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 16.3942115768 61% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 2260.96107784 78% => OK
No of words: 363.0 441.139720559 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87603305785 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.56307096286 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60433317433 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 204.123752495 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490358126722 0.468620217663 105% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 705.55239521 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.22255489022 166% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 19.7664670659 76% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.8473053892 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.678418841 57.8364921388 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 119.503703932 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2 23.324526521 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.70786347227 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.25449101796 133% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 6.88822355289 87% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.67664670659 64% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217574483478 0.218282227539 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746595985557 0.0743258471296 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850160413864 0.0701772020484 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114528174908 0.128457276422 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0730030317281 0.0628817314937 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.3799401198 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.3550499002 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.197005988 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.5979740519 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32208582834 98% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 98.500998004 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 12.3882235529 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.1389221557 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.9071856287 101% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

samples:
https://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-taken-me…

----------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ??? out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 15
No. of Words: 363 350
No. of Characters: 1718 1500
No. of Different Words: 165 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.365 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.733 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.503 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 125 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 76 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 53 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 32 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 40.333 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 17.224 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.431 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.764 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.168 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5