Although innovations such as video, computers, and the Internet seem to offer schools improved methods for instructing students, these technologies all too often distract from real learning.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement mentions that technology like internet and videos can distract students from learning. It is obvious that technology distraction exists, but every student has a choice to use it for learning or for entertainment. Thus, schools can have regulation programs to reduce the technology distraction.
First of all, we definitely cannot ignore the numerous positive learning consequences by using technology. Imagine a country, Iran, where there was not internet to help students to understand textbook contents better. Consider how much easier it could be for students to study with innovations like teaching websites and not just textbooks. Technology can bring an opportunity for teachers to teach their concepts better and deeper to students.
Additionally, depending on the concept everybody learns better by using different methods. For example, some students learn better with reading different articles, research papers, online books, online flash cards, and practice tests. But some students learn better with watching videos and movies, and seeing pictures. No matter what is the teaching concept and how students learn better, technologies like Internet and computes have brought a lot of ways for teachers to teach better and for students to learn better.
However, some teachers and parents believe that unlimited use of Internet can be a distraction in schools. Obviously, students who spend a lot of their time playing video games, checking their Facebook, and chatting online cannot focus on their studying; however, we cannot blame the technology. There are always two sides of technology; bad and good sides. Thus, it depends on students to use it positively or negatively. In addition, schools can easily install especial programs to filter video games, websites, and Facebook.
Technology like Internet and videos can definitely improve and bring unlimited teaching and learning techniques. Surely students can get extra help from different online websites to learn deeper. In case of distraction, schools can have regulation programs to guide and monitor students.
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 50
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...pending on the concept everybody learns better by using different methods. For example...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...thods. For example, some students learn better with reading different articles, resear...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...practice tests. But some students learn better with watching videos and movies, and se...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...teaching concept and how students learn better, technologies like Internet and compute...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 513, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... teach better and for students to learn better. However, some teachers and parents b...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, thus, for example, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 318.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60062893082 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7835873349 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525157232704 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.0195038653 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.7368421053 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7368421053 23.4991977007 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 5.21951772744 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200525140693 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720414250425 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493439345898 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132105578043 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493471563504 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.