Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
To be a great leader required many abilities, which make them accomplishing their mission. I believe that either the sound moral judgment or to maintain the respect of his or her peers are equally important.
Sound moral judgment is one of the most important characteristics of an effective leader. Because the leader needs to take responsibility to make a critical decision at the right time. Therefore, sound moral judgment is a necessary skill. For example, the coronavirus outbreak that has happened recently. The president of Taiwan made a critical decision to ban the export of the surgical mask in order to make sure Taiwan has enough stock of surgical masks to prevent the virus. Despite the Taiwanese government was being questioned because of the ban, if it is necessary to ban the export, which could help other countries' people. consequently, the virus is being very wide-spread in Taiwan, people appreciate the government made the right decision. Thus, sound moral judgment plays an important role in this circumstance.
On the other hand, maintain the respect is also important. The trustworthy connection among peers can make work more efficient. In the coronavirus case, if the authorities keep questioning each other, which might be an obstacle for making the right decision at the critical timing. Moreover, the lack of respect could undermine the result. If the executioner does not trust the leader, he or she could make his or her decision at the end, which might disobey the leader's will and lead to a bad result.
Therefore, in my perspective, the different abilities of composition are equally important to a leader, we will never know if the leader lack of which ability would lead to the bad ending, so the best scenario is that the leader can sharp all of the abilities no matter moral judgment or the ability to remaining respect from others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...characteristics of an effective leader. Because the leader needs to take responsibility...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 633, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...hich could help other countries people. consequently, the virus is being very wide-spread in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...t scenario is that the leader can sharp all of the abilities no matter moral judgment or t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 311.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04501607717 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82728275483 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51768488746 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 68.2710590221 60.3974514979 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0625 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3125 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413277222229 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132599077565 0.0831039109588 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154672234614 0.0758088955206 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241052946197 0.150359130593 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454910896255 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.