Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
An effective judgment is a very huge task for a leader to make. A great leader is someone who respects peer's opinions and makes a decision, considering their opinions is equally important to analyze and make a moral judgment.
The statement attempts to convey that respecting peers is also equally important to make a decision. Considering our day to day life as an example, Manger is the person who leads the project and have the rights to make a decision. Although he has sole rights to do that, successful manger would be the one who considers and examines his team members views on client's requrements, analyze the situation and make a proper judgement. For instance, there's a dedline to be met. Manager first discusses the issues that are not resolved, scrutinize each issue, discuss with team members about their strengths and weaknesses and streamline a plan to meet the deadline. A cogent leader is the one who works meticulously by considering and respecting peers views.
Jeff Bezos, CEO of Amazon is one of the few successful leaders who make great decisions by considering their employees opinions and thoughts. Amazon first was in to E-commerce, but then now with the emerging trend of being cashless he came up with a new idea 'Amazon Pay' . This comes up only when all the employees work together, provide their inputs and analyze their competetors such as PAYTM, gpay etc. Therefore, considering employee opinions and views helped him take an efficacious decision of starting a new application. Adding to this. to make a decision regarding the employees welfare, he organized many surveys to understand their needs, challenges etc and he came up with an effective plan that is well appreciated by the employees.
A prudent leader is always the one who succeds in making an effective decision. If a leader goes along with his peers, respects them and makes an judgment this would be appreciated by people as this is a collective decision taken considering all the opinions, views and aspects of an issue.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
- Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader it is not as important as a leader s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 445, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
... make a proper judgement. For instance, theres a dedline to be met. Manager first disc...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ss he came up with a new idea Amazon Pay . This comes up only when all the employe...
^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: To
...ting a new application. Adding to this. to make a decision regarding the employees...
^^
Line 4, column 143, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...with his peers, respects them and makes an judgment this would be appreciated by p...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1685.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97050147493 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80816130167 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519174041298 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2632970395 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.3125 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1875 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242995470852 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909141307263 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883635920372 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194788921415 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999396938972 0.0667264976115 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.