Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
Sound moral judgement is a significant characteristic of an effective leader. In fact, sound moral judgement and ability to maintain the respect of peers are interwined closely and are are not as dispatrate as presented in th above statement. A good sense of morality can go a long way in ensuring respect of peers.
History is witnees to the fact that influential leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Nelson Mandela and the kindred have demonstrated strong moral judgement. These leaders were able to inspire mass movements through their ability to separate the good from the bad and lead by examples in embracing the good. Mahatma Gandhi appealed to the conscience of masses and enlightened their morality. This ability ultimately earned him respect of peers and contemporaries around the world.
We often look up to our leader in times of crisis and urge them to show the way. It is imperative in such situations that our leaders make the right choices. Sometimes the definition of correct can be subjective and debatable but it is important for leaders to make a choice and justify its correctness. A recent study has shown that people are more likely to follow strong leaders who can make correct moral choices and be steadfast in their belief than leaders who vacillate between choices.
Critics can argue that strongmen who stoke public emotion without weighing the moral righteousness of their decisions often command resepct from peers. However, it goes without saying that such leaders are known as much for their popularity as for the brevity of their existence. A case in point being the dramatic rise and swift decline of dictatorial leaders in the middle east. Once people realise the fallacies of such leadership, their respect for them diminishes spirally and eventually vanishes.
Therefore, it can be concluded that sound moral judgement is as important a characteristic of an effective leader as any and it ensures the leader's ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers. Thus they go hand in hand and must coexist in an individual for him to become an effective leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: are
...ect of peers are interwined closely and are are not as dispatrate as presented in th ab...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...ective leader as any and it ensures the leaders ability to maintain the respect of his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 202, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...intain the respect of his or her peers. Thus they go hand in hand and must coexist i...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, as for, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 347.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05763688761 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76242484764 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527377521614 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0965961675 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.235294118 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4117647059 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52941176471 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414730450644 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134332292952 0.0831039109588 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.14801212344 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251699871434 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172874214361 0.0667264976115 259% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.