Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.
A leader's ability to make sound moral judgements disparages the ability to maintain respect among his/her peers.
Four animals - The lion, the baboon, an elephant and a squirrel were all stuck in an island. They were in need of two resources - food to survive, and a leader to manage.
When it was time to elect the leaders, the lion roared in dominion, for it is the king of the jungle. It felt that with the respect garnered, he would make an effective leader. But the squirrel had a clever idea. A leader a day, for four days, and the best of the four will be elected as the leader. After the four days, the winner of the election was the squirrel. A temporary leap from this figurative story to our reality poses an important question. Is it the respect that makes one an effective leader?
The answer is a startling no. It is not just the ability to maintain respect among peers, but predominantly the ability to make sound moral judgements. Respect follows when a leader makes good judgements at the right time. The lion has been around the jungle for years, maintaining just the respect. Nobody bothered to look at the squirrel. But its ability to think through a convoluted problem, and propose a universal solution made it an effective leader.
It is possible that a leader who is well-respected has more influence than a leader whose characteristic is just making sound judgements. With that magnitude of influence, it is possible to solve world-crisis when a nation/country is under havoc. The leader, through his influence, can easily import resources from his friend nations/countries across the globe.
Even in the above scenario, the well-respected leader has made a sound judgement by contacting his friend when chaos ensued.
All in all, the ability to make sound judgements overpowers the respect garnered by a leader.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-30 | rahatumar9072 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-30 | qwertyy | 54 | view |
| 2023-09-24 | Adelaida | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | Mayuresh08 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
A leaders ability to make sound moral judgements ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 313.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92012779553 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84295241481 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498402555911 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 704.065955056 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6818351499 60.3974514979 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.3333333333 118.986275619 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9047619048 23.4991977007 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.904761904762 5.21951772744 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458783136027 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130212053519 0.0831039109588 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108384848783 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226656430399 0.150359130593 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717209507367 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 14.1392134831 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 48.8420337079 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 100.480337079 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.