Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Although sound moral judgment is an important characteristic of an effective leader, it is not as important as a leader’s ability to maintain the respect of his or her peers.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Many people might think that for a leader, respecting friends and companions is more significant than making an ethical judgment. It is true that peers are a important element in any peson's life. However, I believe making moral judgment is a foremost characteristic for any person, specially leaders. Nobody should prioritize friends over fairness.

Firstly, effective leaders are those persons who navigate others toward a certain direction, even sometimes in a wrong direction. As a result, having a characteristics of making moral judgement is the most important for a leader to make a fair decision and show people the right path. If the leaders compromise ethical judgement to ensure the respect of their peers, then justice might be denied. Moreover, the leader who takes such unfair customs, will be accused of neputism which is not beneficial both for the leader and the people who follow the leader.

Secondly, as people follow the leaders in our society, it is important for the leaders to be just to maintain law and order in a nation. If the leaders start to overlook laws and regulations for their peers, other person finds it unfair and lose repect in abiding by the laws. Additionally, people lose respect towards the leader who is unfair and put less emphasis in following him.

Furthermore, peers are human beings and no person is perfect, people make mistakes. Sometimes people do not understand their mistakes or they are commiting a crime. If leaders do not identify their peers' mistake in order to preserve their respect, then they might not understand that they are wrong. As a result, they would put no effort on improving themselves and they would unknowingly repeat same mistakes again and again.

In conclusion, even if the peers are important in life and people should not hurt their respect, however, importance of moral judgement outweights the respect of the peers in this case.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 jason123 50 view
2020-01-25 arpit6798 79 view
2020-01-25 srujanakeerthi 50 view
2020-01-25 srujanakeerthi 50 view
2020-01-25 srujanakeerthi 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Nafisa Ali Anika :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...cal judgment. It is true that peers are a important element in any pesons life. H...
^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a characteristic' or simply 'characteristics'?
Suggestion: a characteristic; characteristics
... a wrong direction. As a result, having a characteristics of making moral judgement is the most i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, even so, in conclusion, as a result, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10443037975 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69478144935 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512658227848 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2393046718 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 100.8125 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218310942618 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748434111229 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532877407094 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130512174332 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574927674811 0.0667264976115 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.