In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The contributions made by individuals in any field of inquiry is vital in the sense that these contributions may be essential in the progress of that field. The contributions made by beginners and experts however differ in terms of practicality -an expert is more likely to provide contributions that can be backed up by facts and experience. Therefore an expert is more likely to prefer contributions that would be significantly effective in that field.
First of all, the level of education an expert has acquired over the years would largely differ from that of a beginner. This subsequently means that an expert is more likely to prefer contributions that can be backed-up by theories and facts. For example, an expert reservoir engineer who is faced with a problem of the perforation strategy for completing an oil well would present strategies based on his knowledge about the oil properties, the reservoir temperature and pressure, PVT parameters, and several other factors. This knowledge would help him/her make calculated decisions. A beginner however is at a disadvantage since it would take a considerable amount of time to garner this technical knowledge.
Furthermore, an expert is more likely to profer significant contributions based on his/her experience level. An expert working in a particular industry for close to 10 years would be able to display fine distinctions in dealing with current real-world problems in that field. For example, a production technologist in an exploration and production company faced with a problem of a significant decrease in oil production would be able to provide management with reasons for such decline. The technologist may be confounded as to whether an increase in water production, a pressure decline, or an increase in gas production is responsible for such decline. However, the technologist's experience and fundamental technical knowledge of the well type would help him/her determine the most likely cause.
In as much as experts are at an advantage in proferring important contributions, a beginner however may be able to reason holistically and think outside the box. This however is very unlikely as there are certain fields that require precision in reasoning and contributions.
In conclusion, a beginner is largely at a disadvantage in providing significant contributions based on his/her lack of experience and technical knowledge. Fields as intricate as engineering would demand a high level of technical knowledge in order to make significant contributions.
- Undergraduate students majoring in Business or in the Sciences should not be required to take any courses in the Humanities since those courses won t benefit their future careers 50
- During the past year Quiot manufacturing had 30 percent more on the job accidents than at the nearby Panoply Industries Plant where the work shifts are one hour shorter than ours Experts say that significant contributing factors in many on the job acciden 50
- Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society s problems 50
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Bec 58
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions Since they were declared a wildl 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 344, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...n be backed up by facts and experience. Therefore an expert is more likely to prefer cont...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...ine. The technologist may be confounded as to whether an increase in water production, a pres...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31698143347 2.79657885939 119% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457070707071 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 684.0 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5593964824 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.176470588 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2941176471 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52941176471 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283042013847 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108407324245 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950616691479 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176251838602 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123262423243 0.0667264976115 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.1639044944 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.