In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
The statement that "in any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions" is a bold assertion, and I would have to disagree with it to a significant extent. While beginners can bring fresh perspectives and innovative ideas to a field, it is not necessarily true that they are more likely to make important contributions compared to experts. The degree to which this statement holds true depends on the nature of the field, the specific circumstances, and the type of contributions one is considering.
In some cases, beginners may indeed make important contributions due to their fresh outlook, lack of preconceived biases, and their willingness to question established norms. For example, in the rapidly evolving world of technology and innovation, newcomers with unique ideas and approaches can disrupt and reshape entire industries. Silicon Valley is full of stories of startup founders who, as beginners, revolutionized the tech world with their novel ideas.
However, it's important to acknowledge that expertise and experience often play a critical role in making valuable contributions. In fields that require a deep understanding of complex theories or extensive practical experience, experts are more likely to make significant advances. In medicine, for instance, beginners may lack the expertise to diagnose and treat complex diseases effectively. The years of training and experience that medical experts possess are crucial for advancing the field.
Furthermore, the significance of a contribution often depends on its context. In some situations, incremental improvements and refinement of existing knowledge are more valuable than radical, disruptive changes. Experts are well-positioned to identify these opportunities for refinement and optimization, given their comprehensive knowledge of the field.
Another aspect to consider is the importance of learning from past mistakes and building on established knowledge. Experts have a deep understanding of the history of their field, including previous mistakes and successes. This historical perspective can guide them in making contributions that avoid repeating past errors and capitalize on past achievements.
In conclusion, while beginners can make important contributions in certain circumstances, the statement that they are more likely to do so than experts is overly simplistic. The likelihood of making important contributions depends on the specific field, the nature of the problem or question at hand, and the type of contribution being considered. Beginners bring innovation and a fresh perspective, but expertise and experience are invaluable in many fields. Therefore, both beginners and experts have their own unique roles and contributions to make in advancing knowledge and practice.
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 66
- Competition for high grades seriously limits the quality of learning at all levels of education Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In deve 66
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people 50
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2416.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79376498801 5.05705443957 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38673134755 2.79657885939 121% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489208633094 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 760.5 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3271944344 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.8 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.500373356155 0.243740707755 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.142141857831 0.0831039109588 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124195064159 0.0758088955206 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256778344059 0.150359130593 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154913376686 0.0667264976115 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.8420337079 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.1743820225 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.1639044944 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.