In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Every industry believes in experience. Be it money or trust, experts always have the upperhand. People put in tremendous efforts to find the most experienced person for their jobs. Saying that, I will be disagreeing with the issue mentions that beginners are likely to make important contributions in inquiry because it the experience of an individual, not mere luck that gives success.
Beginners are fledglings who need the right kind of nurturing. They are in the rudimentary stages and need a push in the right direction. For example, if an apple fell on from the tree on someone who is just getting accustomed to physics, it most likely wouldn’t have got the results that were seen by an apple falling on Newton who was already an expert in the subject of physics. It is in the beginning stages that an individual has to have a keen eye and learn.
Inquiries might result in a big pool of possibilities and it is very easy for someone to get lost in this pool. We see a lot of detective movies where even agents with a ton of experience fail to catch the culprit. These are not cakewalks even for an experienced person. So we can imagine how a beginner who has just entered the field could be lost in such inextricable matters. Getting through this by working hand in hand with an experienced individual and learning from their own mistakes will help beginners in seeing things in the right perspective as they progress.
As mentioned above, experience makes you look in the right directions for answers in difficult situations. Lets take a simple example of an avid reader of crime. When a reader starts of with his/her first book, it might not be an easy task to find out who the culprit could be. But as the reader reads a hundred books, their experience makes them look at the right clues and find the murderer. It’s experience that made them develop a keen eye to clues.
It can be argued that beginners may see things a different way and give new perspectives in inquiry. This might be true to some extent, but looking at a hundred different possibilities and wasting time is not the same as narrowing all those possibilities and finding that one right path which is a characteristic of an expert. By saying this I would like to conclude that it is not always true that a beginner could be making great contributions than an experienced individual.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...son for their jobs. Saying that, I will be disagreeing with the issue mentions that beginners ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ns for answers in difficult situations. Lets take a simple example of an avid reader...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70263788969 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7509078876 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517985611511 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0315810494 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.380952381 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152549055705 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416753481138 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042886491743 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862756874295 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339405171858 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 202, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...son for their jobs. Saying that, I will be disagreeing with the issue mentions that beginners ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...ns for answers in difficult situations. Lets take a simple example of an avid reader...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, as to, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1961.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70263788969 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7509078876 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517985611511 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.0315810494 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.380952381 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8571428571 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152549055705 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416753481138 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042886491743 0.0758088955206 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862756874295 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0339405171858 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 48.8420337079 141% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 12.1743820225 68% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.98 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.