In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.
While beginner possesses curiosity, enthusiasm and fresh energy, are more open to surroundings, all these are not sufficient for great contribution in the field of inquiry. Most of the achievement and contributions in any field are result of persuasive research, integrated knowledge and obviously expertise of people of that particular field.
In the field of science, researchers and scientist have contributed a lot for the wellbeing of human kind through many great invention and development such as vaccine, lifesaving medicine, electricity and electronic devices and many more. In vaccine invention and drug discovery, expert knowledge is cardinal whereas beginners can contribute in these field only by giving their effort in labor and carrying out different experiment guided by experts. Beginner may opine and can suggest some modification to accelerate the whole process but expert knowledge is required to analysis the pros and concessions of such modification.
In case of problem solving issue or detective field beginners do a lot, they are curious about almost all the things and clues which may be of trivial importance. Whereas expert carry out the whole process through a guided protocol. Later approach is much more pragmatic because, here time play crucial role. In this fast world every problem is desired to be solved in shortest time period. If a problem is being solved by the beginner solely they might not be aware of the whole process and they might not understand the importance of fast work and ultimately their approach will not be the best one.
With every experiment and research project there must be some associated risk factors if handled by novice may bring out devastating result. For example, if anyone want to carry out experiment involving chemical reactions, here only subjective knowledge will not work rather expertise will contribute much more. Same goes for microbiological research. Experimentation and research on biohazard is not the cup of tea for beginners. If they attempt to do these works, there always be risk of splitting and spreading contaminant to the environment and if it is the case of any deadly virus then the result will be unimaginable.
Experts in any kind of inquiry field are already acquainted to the related field persons and their lobbying is very important in getting funding and collaboration. Furthermore, people in general will heed experts rather than beginner and expert’s opinion is valued everywhere that can be any case of problem solving, crisis management, development of existing processes. So great contribution is more likely coming from the expert than beginner though beginners are also part and parcel of any research field and for future endeavor because todays focused beginners are future’s experts.
Studies has shown that most of the ground breaking contributions have been resulted from the person’s dedicated and focused research of age 30 to 50. And these people are experts and knowledgeable in their field. In case of any new research and problem solving curiosity is a primary thing but at the same time uninterrupted focus is also required which sometimes remain absent in the beginners and there is no evidence yet that curiosity is absent in expert. So consistent results are more likely coming from the person devoted to the experiment with curiosity and immobile focus and fixed aim.
Overall when it comes to the matter of major contribution in inquiry field, it is more likely from the experts due to their knowledge, experience, aim, and thinking stability moreover beginner in any field works under the supervision of experts so in the contribution of beginner there is always an important role played by experts. Beginners cannot be the worthy of the recognition by their own first.
- Some people believe that scientific discoveries have given us a much better understanding of the world around us Others believe that science has revealed to us that the world is infinitely more complex than we ever realized 83
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of b 58
- It is better to work as a team than as an individual to succeed 73
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 47
- A recent study of eighteen rhesus monkeys provides clues as to the effects of birth order on an individual s levels of stimulation The study showed that in stimulating situations such as an encounter with an unfamiliar monkey firstborn infant monkeys prod 40
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ues which may be of trivial importance. Whereas expert carry out the whole process thro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the shortest'.
Suggestion: in the shortest
...d every problem is desired to be solved in shortest time period. If a problem is being solv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...astating result. For example, if anyone want to carry out experiment involving chemi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in general, in short, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3197.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24958949097 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89065337812 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474548440066 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1015.2 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9470037481 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.208333333 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406252582487 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110722034984 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110680773217 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231275920682 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150273136886 0.0667264976115 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 163, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ues which may be of trivial importance. Whereas expert carry out the whole process thro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the shortest'.
Suggestion: in the shortest
...d every problem is desired to be solved in shortest time period. If a problem is being solv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 164, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wants'.
Suggestion: wants
...astating result. For example, if anyone want to carry out experiment involving chemi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, in general, in short, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 36.0 19.5258426966 184% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3197.0 2235.4752809 143% => OK
No of words: 609.0 442.535393258 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24958949097 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.96768813016 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89065337812 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 289.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.474548440066 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 1015.2 704.065955056 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.9470037481 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.208333333 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.79166666667 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.97078651685 141% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406252582487 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110722034984 0.0831039109588 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110680773217 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231275920682 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150273136886 0.0667264976115 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 156.0 100.480337079 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.