The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
As much as we would like to think that everyone on the planet works together in a benevolent fashion, the reality is that in order to obtain leadership positions, young people must be competitive with one another. Cooperation is essential for the success of society and humanity as a whole but that alone will not give young people the "edge" for deserving positions in leadership. Colleges and universities ensure that young people who are competitive with one another are more selected for than those who are passively cooperative. That is not even mentioning how the world of politics work, with many politicians employing harsh tactics to gain notoriety and powerful positions. Although both qualities are essential for a person to be successful in society, competition has to be instilled more than cooperation.
High end colleges in this era, such as Ivy League institutions, require young applicants to be incredibly competitive in order to gain admittance into the university. Private post-secondary institutions are the most sought after schools for young people wishing to venture in the world of academia further and acquire skills to hold leadership positions in their dream careers. unfortunately, these private universities require high GPAs, SAT/ACT scores, and a wide background in extracurricular services. Unless students undertake a competitive path to obtain the needed credentials, then they can no longer hope for admittance into those institutions. Young people have to strive to be successful and become better than their peers so they can stand out and matriculate into well respected schools. The same can be stated for those wishing to attend medical school and graduate school, as those acceptance rates tend to be lower than the average undergraduate admittance rate.
Outside of acquiring a post-secondary education is the "real world" where people who perform their job better than their coworkers obtain higher positions of power and leadership. For example, at Muhlenberg College, an undergraduate liberal arts college, students in the sciences can work in the research labs of the school's faculty. If one of those students stands out (i.e. helps get more papers published and contributes ideas to the lab) then they would be promoted to head research assistant which gives several leadership capabilities to that student. Another example is the world of politics. While cooperation can be value in that world, competition is at the heart of politics, with politicians doing what it takes to be noticed by their constituents and peers.
Cooperation is an attribute that can help accomplish tasks, but cannot lead to positions in leadership. The need for two or more people in the same leadership position can understandably cause a fair amount of chaos within an organization. This is why the US has three branches of government and one person being President. If there were two presidents, nothing would get accomplished due to the sheer amount of time it would take for the two leaders to agree. This is also why its rare to see co-CEOs in companies, it fails to accomplish anything.
In conclusion, instilling a sense of cooperation in lieu of competition is detrimental for a society to prepare its young citizens for various leadership positions. Competition inspires young people to succeed and strive to be better than what they currently are. If competition is not instilled, then people will not know to improve because they will just have someone else helping them finish a job.
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 83
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 43
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a benevolent fashion" with adverb for "benevolent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t everyone on the planet works together in a benevolent fashion, the reality is that in order to obtain...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 379, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Unfortunately
...rship positions in their dream careers. unfortunately, these private universities require hig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 328, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...es can work in the research labs of the schools faculty. If one of those students stand...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 376, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[4]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'helps'.
Suggestion: helps
...ecause they will just have someone else helping them finish a job.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, still, then, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2987.0 2235.4752809 134% => OK
No of words: 565.0 442.535393258 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28672566372 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87542086881 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06284400383 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 288.0 215.323595506 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509734513274 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 935.1 704.065955056 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2242689562 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.458333333 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5416666667 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174793810129 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540349576454 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0603652116756 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111085250861 0.150359130593 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0518604735925 0.0667264976115 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.