The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In a multitude of fictitious literature, the setting may consist of a Utopian society were everything is assumed to be perfect. However, like I mentioned, those societies are a product of an author’s imagination and cannot exist. Yet, it is possible for society to improve but in order to do so the figureheads of the society need to have their attention focused onto society’s faults. To accomplish such a feat, the denizens of a society must challenge the authority that reigns over it. Examples of two well-established nations will be looked at to demonstrate how challenging authority can impact society for the better.
In our own history, the American Revolution provides a strong example of how the citizens of the oppressed British-controlled American colonies challenged Britain’s authority and established a society that is superior. Through intense taxation and the disregard for the people residing within the colonies, the society created by the British in those colonies was bound to crumble due to the inequality of respect being shared between the King and the colonists. The acts of rebellion, such as the Boston Tea Party, is a textbook example of challenging authority and informing the King that the way he runs society would not do in what would become the US. So, to create a better society, the Founding Fathers took it upon themselves to declare independence from GB and succeeded in creating a nation that many travel to today to grasp freedom and accomplish their dreams. In America we can protest laws and actions that we do not favor and inspire societal change via our freedom of speech. We can challenge authority without facing extreme levels of punishments like death.
In contrast, North Korea is an example in which society looks prosperous from the inside of the nation, but from the outside looks like a horrid dictatorship. In North Korea, the penalties for speaking out against the government, and therefore the society of North Korea, include public humiliation and death. Those penalties prevent the majority of the population from speaking out against their leader, Kim Jung Un. Thanks to the advent of video cameras and the filming technique known as “vlogging”, individuals, if careful, can show the rest of the world the life of North Korea. While those who have a high socioeconomic status appear cheerful and happy to reside within the country, the films depict a censored world where history is rewritten. This approach to controlling society prevents those native to North Korea from being able to interact with the rest of the world at a high level due to the false backgrounds provided from the citizens’ home country. Stories of internment camps also provide evidence that controlling a society through fear and preventing the outcry of others will hurt the society of a nation to a large extent. A small number of countries support North Korea and many countries are against North Korea because of its hands-on approach to societal control which makes it unable to join the greater society created by the rest of the nations.
In conclusion, the betterment of society can occur if authority is challenged. The success of the US and its ability for its citizens to speak out against the government allow for the country to adapt and its society to improve; whereas, the inability to speak out in North Korea hinders any societal improvement.
- The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and s 66
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree 83
- The following is a recommendation from the Board of Directors of Monarch Books."We recommend that Monarch Books open a café in its store. Monarch, having been in business at the same location for more than twenty years, has a large customer base bec 55
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the comp 43
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...etting may consist of a Utopian society were everything is assumed to be perfect. Ho...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1162, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: A few; Some
... society of a nation to a large extent. A small number of countries support North Korea and many ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, whereas, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2872.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 562.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1103202847 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.86893614481 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95153628972 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510676156584 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 895.5 704.065955056 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 12.0 4.99550561798 240% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9491000807 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 118.986275619 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1 23.4991977007 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35 5.21951772744 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119651250058 0.243740707755 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400767989294 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291098838464 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0815672923773 0.150359130593 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0234234742223 0.0667264976115 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.