The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or
disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position
you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific
circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be
advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Having a good sense of what is right and what is wrong is a fundamental aspect that the people of a society must embrace for the community's betterment. Here the prompt suggests that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. Such a stance would entrench the sense of what is right and wrong firmly into a person but there are some inherent pitfalls to this idea which if ignored would be detrimental to a society or country. As a result a moderately agree with the prompt and will be discussing me views in the coming paragraphs.
First of all, children are highly impressionable. If we keep on pointing out their flaws and mistakes and punish them for it, an everlasting fear of failure might stem inside them. To elaborate more on this point, children will more often than not make mistakes as after all they are 'children'. As a result ignoring their mistakes and praising their good deeds along with celebrating all the small to large achievements go a long way in ensuring a healthy upbringing. If we draw examples from the past, most of the serial killers of the early 1900s to late 1900s had a troubled childhood. Most of the serial killers traced the source of their mental degradation to parents incessantly berating them scathing remarks for their mistakes. This very vividly points out the negative aspects of not overlooking the negative actions of children. Thus if we ignore them or look at them with a much kinder outlook the society will be a better place for it's inhabitants.
Furthermore, praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones help promote a much more healthy workplace culture. From most of the surveys relating to mental health at the office; employees most of the time cite an abusive boss as the main reason for them not wanting to come to work every morning. Consequently, an unhappy work force leads to productivity falling drastically. This example further highlights the positive aspect of the policy suggested in the prompt but from a different angle. Furthermore, several companies in Bangladesh realizing this issue has instructed their Human Resource department to organize many seminars with the team leads of different departments to address this. As a result, promote the culture of praising success and ignore or handle with care all the failures at a workplace.
On the contrary, if we look at the perspective of both children and work force. If we do not show them the correct path and keep on ignoring their mistakes as if nothing happened will promote a different message. For example, if any children go out and gets himself/herself involved in a fight and parents act like nothing bad happened and lets it go, the children will be missing out on valuable life lessons. Life lessons that would go a long way in ensuring their life turns out good. This same example can be extended to ignoring mistakes in the work place, which will promote a lazy culture in the office if an employee keeps on getting away with the same mistake again and again.
Thus in conclusion, we can summarize that there are no solid answers to this debate thus we must consider a policy that is neither too harsh on mistakes but not too lenient on mistakes either. But positive must always be praised no matter what the situation is.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 64
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 66
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals One year ago we introduced our first product Bargain Brand breakfast cereal Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top selling cereal companies Alth 73
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 50
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 404, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...me inherent pitfalls to this idea which if ignored would be detrimental to a socie...
^^
Line 3, column 839, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...oking the negative actions of children. Thus if we ignore them or look at them with ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...h the same mistake again and again. Thus in conclusion, we can summarize that th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, so, thus, after all, for example, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2738.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 569.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81195079086 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88402711743 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64356207997 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.481546572935 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 851.4 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5006786465 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.52 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.76 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149235862957 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0481564794109 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607001981499 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882420147834 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048370458728 0.0667264976115 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.