Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals.
A society is not a singular entity, but rather a multidimensional, multi-layer model. To comprehend the complexities of society, we must study the diverse characteristics of the people that comprise the society in addition to the study of heroes and role models that society chooses as its role models. I disagree with the given claim mainly because of two reasons: other diverse sets of factors that the author fails to consider, and the generalization of character from a single person (heroes or role models) to the entire society as a whole.
First, the society is made of people of different religions, race, and ethnicity, their languages, traditions, beliefs, and history vary to the extent that one should not overlook. Studying the people's traditions, festivals they celebrate, gods they believe in, and their moral principles gives a clear understanding of the social and spiritual aspects of the society. By closely examining the focus and determination to the importance of education, politics, and adherence to the laws of the nation, one can get insights into the economical, educational and political characteristics of the society, as well as how progressive the people of the society are.
Secondly, heroes and role models, though undoubtedly represent a brief overview of the morals that the society sees as its highest, are just individuals like any other person from that society, and cannot give a complete picture of the society's character. As an example, Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, one of the great scientists and former president of India, was indeed an honest man who thrived to grow India as a nation at every opportunity he got. He was a humble person, compassionate towards poor, and role model for the youth then and even now. Does this mean that all the people from various groups of the Indian society have all these characteristics? Certainly, not. Similarly, take an example of a leader the people elected because of his fake appearance of a good personality. Any character flow or wickedness of this leader does not represent the people who elected him or her.
Lastly, heroes and role models of the society may have none of the characteristics because of which the society chooses them as an idol. Movie stars are considered heroes in almost every society the world over. It is true that a large group of people is involved in idealizing these celebrities if not all. However, the character they play in a movie, no matter good or evil, does not reflect the characteristics of that society.
In the view of the above, it can be concluded that probing the character heroes and role models of the society gives only a facade of the myriad aspects to understand the society as a whole. In order to get a full picture of the society and its people, one must study social, spiritual, economical, political, educational factors, and history
of the various groups of people that comprise that society.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 54
- Some people believe that in order to be effective political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principles for the sake of compromise Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently 50
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In devel 75
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge 75
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, lastly, look, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, well, in addition, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2450.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 489.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01022494888 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91833439789 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490797546012 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 792.9 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.7963797488 60.3974514979 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.111111111 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 23.4991977007 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 5.21951772744 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403442700073 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122431780544 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117501855475 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217864026307 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147611976085 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.