Claim: The study of a nation’s prominent historical leaders and figures is a poor way to study its history.
Reason: The clearest lens through which to view a nation’s history is the welfare of its entire population.
Develop a response to the claim in which you discuss whether or not you agree with it. Focus specifically on whether or not you agree with the reason upon which the claim is based.
As students, we all might have read about the great leaders we had. Their struggle to make the country better had inspired us all. Eventhough there are a lot of leaders from time to time we admire and cherish, there are many other we ignore or fail to even recognise. These forgotten heros also take with them the stories of many other lives they have changed or they were changed by. Just as we missed the lives of such leaders, we also miss many lives of the total population. Hence, it is important for us to also study the welfare of the entire population to know a nation’s history.
The leaders we lionize come from many parts of the nation but not all. The leaders we study only show us the lives they’ve touched but forfiet many other. Knowing the changes made by such people in various places would be sufficient to know about their lives but to know the nation’s history, it would just be superficial. The regions that did not have such leaders and the regions that could not have the influence of other leaders also play a crucial part in the country which needs to be considered.
For example, considering only the places which gave India great freedom fighters will not be sufficient to completely know the struggle for independence. We need to know about the kingdoms that have fallen and conquered by the British empire, the lives of people who were looted every now and then and also about the people who are treated miserably. All these stories didn’t have a leader at that point of time, but helped create many. Studying such incidents helps us to draw a path which lead the country to fight. Hence, it is crucial to count in the welfare of the total population.
As few people might argue that leaders are influenced by the people’s lives, and hence studing them is analogous to studying the people too. This can be wrong in many cases as the leaders are influenced not by all the people in the country, only by the people around. The leaders lives although might have influenced a larger part of the population, lack of communication in antedate times might not have reached societies in remote places. The people in these places have their stories too, which are to be properly studied for the nation’s history.
Considering that the nation’s prominent leaders always do not touch or bring into account the prosperity or welfare of all the people in a country; and that their lives play a significant role in understanding the then situations and scenarios in the nation, their lives are to be studied too. Ignoring to do so might give a good understanding of the nation’s history but will definitely fail to give an accurate one.
- Because of funding limits, many schools are cutting back on what they see as “fringe” disciplines, such as music education. This is a mistake. Since music education is important even beyond the enjoyment it brings to the knowledgeable listener, its fu 50
- Because of funding limits many schools are cutting back on what they see as fringe disciplines such as music education This is a mistake Since music education is important even beyond the enjoyment it brings to the knowledgeable listener its funding shoul 75
- A nation should ultimately be responsible for the health, welfare, and prosperity of its own citizens. Write a response discussing your reaction to the stated policy. Justify your reasoning for the position you take. Explain the potential consequences or 75
- Claim: The study of a nation’s prominent historical leaders and figures is a poor way to study its history.Reason: The clearest lens through which to view a nation’s history is the welfare of its entire population.Develop a response to the claim in wh 66
- Some people argue that confidence and optimism are critical to achieving a dream, while others believe that selfless hard work is the only way to reach a goal.Write a response in which you determine which view bears the closest resemblance to your own. In 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'others'?
Suggestion: others
...e we admire and cherish, there are many other we ignore or fail to even recognise. Th...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun other seems to be countable; consider using: 'many others'.
Suggestion: many others
... lives they've touched but forfiet many other. Knowing the changes made by such peopl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 280, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
...re, the lives of people who were looted every now and then and also about the people who are treat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 286, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'live'.
Suggestion: live
... only by the people around. The leaders lives although might have influenced a larger...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, for example, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2245.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77659574468 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61783069994 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.423404255319 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7800797997 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.904761905 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.380952381 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189076039753 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071966367483 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668680719906 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128361385683 0.150359130593 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382033407451 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 14.1392134831 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.