Company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence. Such monitoring will reduce the waste of resources such as time and system capacity, as well as protect the company from lawsuits.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Surely, a company must take measures to protects the company's reputation as well as reduces the waste of resources such as time and system capacity. This is necessary to track the employee's activities as well as gain insights into an ongoing project. However, this practice might reduce the determination and trust of the employees. Thus, I partially agree with the author's claim that the company should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence to improve the efficiency of the company. My viewpoints are aptly illustrated through the below-mentioned examples.
Firstly, conducting routine monitoring can bring in insightful results that can help the management to make important decisions regarding the further that can be taken to predict the future needs of the project. This method can be also useful in predicting the time that would be required to complete any project. For instance, several companies that handle data, have software that conducts routine monitoring of email correspondence to extrapolate results by checking the trends prevalent data that could be obtained from the email correspondence.
In addition to this, the company can conduct routing monitoring of all employee email-correspondence to detect the presence of any error or bug which can have detrimental effects on the working of the entire model. In fields related to programming, a particular code can frequently produce errors depending upon its use and requirements. For instance, the companies like Microsoft must conduct a daily routine check for the presence of any error to ensure the smooth working of a project and prevent any future lawsuit against them.
However, in contrast to the above statement, conducting routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence can lead to discontentment among the employees and they would start to lose interest in that project. For instance, installing software that could determine the time spent by that employee for the project can give misleading or inaccurate results. Further, some employees might feel that the company has taken this measure because the management is doubting the employees' motives and do not have trust in the employees.
To sum up, the company management should conduct routine monitoring of all employee e-mail correspondence as it is beneficial for them to gain several insights into the project and also helps in checking the presence of any error or bug in the project. However, they should ensure that such kind of routine checking should not engender dissatisfaction among the employees and hence, affect the overall efficiency of the project.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | DCAD123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-04-09 | Aaishani De | 58 | view |
| 2022-10-16 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-06 | asm01 | 83 | view |
- Two years ago the town of Ocean View built a new municipal golf course and resort hotel During the past two years tourism in Ocean View has increased new businesses have opened there and Ocean View s tax revenues have risen by 30 percent The best way to i 73
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports swimming boating and fishing among their favorite recreational activities The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits however and the city park department devotes little of i 68
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the mayor of Wistfold A recent study revealed that the number of children requiring medical attention for illnesses in our town is 40 percent higher than in the neighboring town of Champsfield Last year the Cham 58
- The following appeared in a memo from the owner of a chain of cheese stores located throughout the United States For many years all the stores in our chain have stocked a wide variety of both domestic and imported cheeses Last year however all of the five 69
- The following memo was published by the Welzaton City Commission A recent nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a safety helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whe 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'protect'.
Suggestion: protect
...Surely, a company must take measures to protects the companys reputation as well as redu...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...odel. In fields related to programming, a particular code can frequently produce...
^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ements. For instance, the companies like Microsoft must conduct a daily routine c...
^^
Line 7, column 460, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ken this measure because the management is doubting the employees motives and do not have t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, however, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in contrast, kind of, such as, as well as, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2235.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 411.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43795620438 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03209097739 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47201946472 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0231431888 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.6875 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.21951772744 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355061820244 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120618751837 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100428952811 0.0758088955206 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217604637366 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0854598820368 0.0667264976115 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 14.1392134831 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.1639044944 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.