Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
I fundamentally agree that discussing controversial topics with those contrasting views does not yield positive outcome because there are many people who tend to be obstinate to change their core beliefs.However, on contrary there are few people who readily change their opinion on discussion--If they are convinced with the opponents explanation and open to accept the facts.It entirely depends on person and we have to see it case-by-case.
Firstly, I concede with the statement , controversial topics itself means there are people on both side of the topic and in issues such as astronomy, politics, people tend to have their own beliefs and they follow it. When someone tries to change the their beliefs it always one on one moot competition and people stick to their core beliefs, In cases like this we cannot change the core belief of the person.Some core beliefs are instilled into persons from the very young age by their parents, society and traditions. It is how we are bought up and our beliefs defines our personality and character. Changing them sometime require a courage - to accept the truth.
Lately in 16th century when Galileo said that the earth is not the centre of universe(According to then society belief), but the sun is the center of universe and earth revolves around it, Many in the society opposed it even he was sentenced to death because-then people thought he was against the beliefs of society.Even today, In Pakistan still some scientists' believe that earth is flat and they are not ready to accept the truth that the earth is round, as we all know. There also exists this kind of people in the society where they are to stubborn to change their opinion. As we discussed earlier it entirely depends on the individual wish, whether they are open to change and accept the truth.
But however there are still people in the society, who change their opinion on a healthy discussions and accept the truth about the topic. For instance, generally public in India tend to believe astrology, clairvoyance a lot. When there was an incident, where a charlatan was exposed for making money by taking advantage on people beliefs. People stopped encouraging such incidents there after.
In crux,discussing controversial topics with those contrasting views does not yield positive outcome until the person is ready for change and it also depends on case to case. Some topics like political beliefs cannot be changed because everyone have own unique beliefs. At last its beliefs that define a person.
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.s regularly even if there is a smal 62
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs. 66
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidewalk walkers. Th 82
- The following is a petition to the city council of Centerville:"Over the past three years, there has been a marked increase in cases of 'sidewalk rage,' similar to the irrational anger drivers experience on the road, but instead among sidewalk walkers. Th 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 205, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: However
... obstinate to change their core beliefs.However, on contrary there are few people who r...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'opponents'' or 'opponent's'?
Suggestion: opponents'; opponent's
...cussion--If they are convinced with the opponents explanation and open to accept the fact...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...xplanation and open to accept the facts.It entirely depends on person and we have ...
^^
Line 5, column 38, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Firstly, I concede with the statement , controversial topics itself means there...
^^
Line 5, column 248, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...follow it. When someone tries to change the their beliefs it always one on one moot compe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Some
...ot change the core belief of the person.Some core beliefs are instilled into persons...
^^^^
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Even
...t he was against the beliefs of society.Even today, In Pakistan still some scientist...
^^^^
Line 9, column 541, Rule ID: TO_TOO[5]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...of people in the society where they are to stubborn to change their opinion. As we...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'But'.
Suggestion: But
...en to change and accept the truth. But however there are still people in the society, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 29, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...truth. But however there are still people in the society, who change their opinio...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 383, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: thereafter
...ople stopped encouraging such incidents there after. In crux,discussing controversial ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 17, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , discussing
...such incidents there after. In crux,discussing controversial topics with those contras...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, still, then, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 45.0 33.0505617978 136% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2117.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05250596659 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74301443023 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489260143198 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 130.788276743 60.3974514979 217% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.133333333 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.21951772744 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 7.80617977528 154% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386646762117 0.243740707755 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120688985816 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114237768219 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235156055044 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104997856202 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.0 11.8971910112 252% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.