Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Educational institutions are entrusted with the responsibility of enabling their students to achieve success in their academic and professional careers. This might be a basis for the statement claiming that educational institutions must dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed. However, this implies that some students are incapable of entering and succeeding in particular fields. It is important to keep in mind, that with the right training and by inculcating the right skill set, any individual can flourish in the field that they desire. Moreover, people tend to be better at a job that they are passionate about. By dissuading students from pursuing certain fields of study, educational institutions risk squashing a student’s passion. Instead of discouraging a student from entering the field that they desire, educational institutions must lay out the pros and cons of the particular field, and provide the student with information and skills that will prove to be helpful in that field.
While it may be argued that some fields have a narrower scope in the job market and students must stay away from those fields, it is ultimately the student’s choice and not the educational institution’s. After being made aware of the facts concerned with the particular field, if a student still wishes to pursue it, the educational institution must be supportive of the decision and help the student develop the skillset and acquire the knowledge that would contribute his or her success in the field.
For instance, if a student is passionate about social work and wishes to pursue that as a career, the educational institution could help the student develop skills that are central to this field. These may include communication skills, knowledge on fundraising and so on. Merely providing the student with a list of books on the particular field could be immensely helpful too.
Dissuading a student from following a particular field of study could also have other detrimental implications. It could result in a loss of confidence and self-esteem, and other deep-seated mental health issues.
To sum it up, educational institutions must encourage students to follow their passions and enable them to succeed in their chosen field of study. Providing students with appropriate resources and skills can go a long way in ensuring their success in even the most niche fields of study.
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 66
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r field could be immensely helpful too. Dissuading a student from following a pa...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... enable them to succeed in their chosen field of study. Providing students with appro...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, while, for instance, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2058.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27692307692 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97736364593 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.479487179487 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5060689105 60.3974514979 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.625 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316500269884 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11729680649 0.0831039109588 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934998737398 0.0758088955206 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1695442269 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889791955741 0.0667264976115 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.