Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
No one has the right to tell anyone the area in which they should specialize, The choice of one's college major is not a trivial one,
because once we have made the decision we begin to second guess it. The prompt recommends that educational institutions should choose fields that are much more employable, rather than those that have fewer job prospects. However, in my opinion, I strongly disagree with this suggestion and argue that students should be encouraged to look inward rather than outward when choosing their field of specialization for two reasons.
firstly, for instance, during the early 1860s, students who studied chemical or nuclear engineering had access to dizzying job opportunities due to the fact that it was being employed in the production of warfare equipment like a nuclear weapon and also used for power plants. most students that were advised by their teachers to specialize in this area due to its glut of opportunities would be making a great mistake because some of these students might not have passion for physics and chemistry, so pushing them to join chemical engineering due to this dizzying job prospects will be a great error because someone who loves to paint and was forced to join chemical engineering might not perform because he abhors the course and later this will affect the productivity of the whole company due to lack of interest on the path of the student.In the 21st centuy most nuclear power plants have been shut down due to its noxious effect on the environment, this consequently leading to the loss of jobs to lots of chemical enginners and most if not all have to start from scratch tonlook for job, But had it been, the students decision on what to specialize on had not been imposed by his tutors he will still have his job and enjoy what he is doing, since its what he loves eventhough the money might not be sufficient to cater for him.
Secondly, for instance in Nigeria there was a time in Nigeria during operation feed the nation, most people were forced to join the agriculture sector or plant in their backyard, individuals who loves to do other things like horse racing or lecturing that are being forced to go into farming will perform below expectation, since they do not derive joy in farming activities, this in turn will affect the overall performance of the agriculture sector there by also affecting the whole economy.
In conclusion, although its good to venture into fields that their prospects of job availability are higher. However, it would not be like enjoying what you love to do eventhough if the pay is small. computer enginnering jobs cant be available forever theres still going to be low employment opportunities in the area because the job market is ever channging, so its best for everyone of us to do what we love rather than what people imposed on us to do.
- The following is a recommendation from the business manager of Monarch Books Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader friendly atmosphere and wide selection of books on all subj 57
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and suppor 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...h they should specialize, The choice of ones college major is not a trivial one, be...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Firstly
...eld of specialization for two reasons. firstly, for instance, during the early 1860s, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Most
... weapon and also used for power plants. most students that were advised by their tea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 844, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... of interest on the path of the student.In the 21st centuy most nuclear power plan...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e by also affecting the whole economy. In conclusion, although its good to vent...
^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Computer
...e to do eventhough if the pay is small. computer enginnering jobs cant be available fore...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...pay is small. computer enginnering jobs cant be available forever theres still going...
^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...innering jobs cant be available forever theres still going to be low employment opport...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, as for, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2363.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 492.0 442.535393258 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80284552846 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70967865282 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6310102216 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 729.0 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 20.2370786517 44% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 54.0 23.0359550562 234% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 285.601423035 60.3974514979 473% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 262.555555556 118.986275619 221% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 54.6666666667 23.4991977007 233% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.4444444444 5.21951772744 296% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0866205397417 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433158740797 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0285675331892 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519486991055 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324896764046 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.5 14.1392134831 202% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 25.13 48.8420337079 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.2 12.1743820225 191% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.45 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 23.6 11.2143820225 210% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 24.0 11.7820224719 204% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.