Educational institutions should dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
In modern times, academia have become a vast collection of different fields of study, each containing the works of countless forerunners, perhaps beyond anyone's ability to comprehend fully by their own. However, some subjects have stagnated across the years, leaving only tricky questions that require immense insight to tackle. Students in these fields undoubtedly are in a precarious situation, as most of them cannot eventually do meaningful contribution to the field. However, I believe it is upon the students themselves to do the decisions, and institutions should not block access to these subjects.
First of all, students should be responsible for their own futures, and educational institutions should always guide students instead of hampering them. Different people have different opinions about areas, and talented students can sometimes discover the key of a brand new age of discovery. Even if these students eventually cannot make major discoveries, even minor ones may at least give a good living in a small circle of people. Life isn't depended on time spent learning, and those who cannot perform well will find better paths to proceed. Of course, the hardships incurred in this process may be great, but this is the student;s own choice, and it is up to the institution to remind the students of hurdles, but never to dissuade them from their future.
Perhaps even more importantly, the very notion of success may be too harsh in real life. Most of us knew our hopes for the future when we grow up, and for some of us success may be different from others. Society have forced the idea of success on may of us for many generations, financial success being paramount, but some would happily accept an offer for work with less pay if it contains other motivations. Young people often dream about their futures, and these can provide immense emotional support well after the age of dreaming. Institutions will do much harm to students if such dissuasion becomes factual hindrance.
Last but not least, even in the most worked patches of land, there are always people who do work and succeed. Acceptance of new entries are sometimes better than those learning in major topics, and even though it may be hard to be truly successful, students can make a living, with less pressure from competition.
Summing the above arguments, I believe it is vital for educational institutions to stop the dissuasion of students. Instead, they should inform the students about different possible outcomes, and leave the decision making entirely to themselves.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...iving in a small circle of people. Life isnt depended on time spent learning, and th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, well, at least, of course, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2151.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13365155131 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72974483856 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565632458234 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 656.1 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 12.0 1.77640449438 676% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5629195657 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.5 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05555555556 5.21951772744 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132516475614 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452080892412 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427186356102 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795621611712 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0321677061157 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.