In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The power of imagination was once considered unimportant or even defying social standards before the liberty of the mind. However, as time passed and novel creations pushed our society along in previous unthinkable ways, people value creativity more than ever before, to the point of considering imagination to be more important of knowledge. However, imagination rarely helps without the guidance of knowledge, as shown in the arguments below, so I cannot concur with this claim.
Firstly, creativity is welcomed in many areas of study, but unbounded creativity creates more problems than it solves. Consider some of the more precise sciences, such as physics and chemistry, the subjects most found to be in place at universities. It is true that innovation is often critical to the creation of new theories and other similar breakthrough, but the consensus is that the ability of a certain theory to make predictions about reality, and the procedure of finding evidence for the theory is what truly constituents modern science. As a consequence, the know-how provided by diligent work in student years and the experience provided in actual work is what truly makes science scientific. Without the power of knowledge, not only is one incapable of research in a useful way, but it would possibly lead to numerous crank theories that circulates in the internet, that undermines public understanding of science to this very day.
Secondly, even in areas that need creativity the most, the skill required in expression of this talent is still greater than many imagined. Art such as music and paintings have always been seen as a model of the importance of creativity. Before the renaissance, artists created their works based on rigid rules of experience, but all of the talents of those times seem outdated compared to the brilliant modern works that take imagination more seriously. However, even in this area, heavy debate about unbounded imagination persists. Famous works such as those by Picasso may seem to contain little traces of knowledge, but on closer examination one can see the incredible skills and techniques hidden inside. Some contemporary works of art contains less knowledge, and is praised by some to be out of ordinary, but other experts warn of the dangers, arguing that these works are no more valuable than the creations of toddlers, showing imagination without any inside purpose. No matter the case, knowledge and skill is still crucial to anyone wishing to become a master of some field of inquiry.
Such is the argument about the relations between knowledge and imagination. At the very least, knowledge is useful on its own right, but less can be said so for imagination. Without the support of knowledge, in most academic and professional fields, imagination may well do more harm than good.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 129, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... more problems than it solves. Consider some of the more precise sciences, such as physics ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 776, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a useful way" with adverb for "useful"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
..., not only is one incapable of research in a useful way, but it would possibly lead to numerous...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...based on rigid rules of experience, but all of the talents of those times seem outdated co...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1045, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'wishes'.
Suggestion: wishes
...ge and skill is still crucial to anyone wishing to become a master of some field of inq...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2371.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16557734205 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84037044315 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544662309368 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 752.4 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7662591224 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.722222222 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149245394482 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480395198486 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445391684887 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101120220927 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383464614538 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.