Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Any individual person has its own psychology and mental thinking process which differentiates from others. The law will be just and morally appropriate for him if it doesn’t affect with his lifestyle, culture and his views. If it goes out of his/her comforting limits, he/she will start to think that this particular law is not just and would try to avoid or resist it. To further illustrate the given claim, I will explain using an example. In India to get admission in government college, there is a reservation quota of 51% for lower castes and scheduled tribes and the rest 49% is for general (open) category. This law has been declared by the government so that it can give opportunity to lower caste people to get admission in renowned colleges (like IITs) and even if any child from that category studies from such prestigious college, he/she can overcome that barrier from which their family were struggling for over years. But controversially, this reduces the opportunity for open category children and thus increasing the competition between them. So in their point of view, they would feel that the law is unjust for them.
Another example that I would like to discuss is regarding the income tax implied while purchasing an estate or land. Here in India, if any male person purchases a house he has to show that his income is sufficient so that he can purchase the house and consequently, an income tax is applied on him. While if the same person purchases the same house plot but in the name of her wife who is a household lady, then that law will not be applied on her and thus no income tax would be applied on them. According to me, this is not appropriate as the law just applies to the purchaser of that estate but does not look into the background of the family or person who is purchasing.
I would like to further add an example to support my position. During the earlier age when there were different kingdoms with their respective kings, there existed a law of taxes for the people living inside the kingdom. Now if the king is merciful and kind, he will allow the law to be implicated in such way that the public of his would not feeling any pinch while paying the taxes. But simultaneously, if he is a tyrant ruler, the people has to pay the taxes anyhow regardless the circumstances whenever the time is due. So for those people, the law to pay the taxes would be unfair to them and they would not accept in their moral views.
To restate it again, every person thinks that a law is morally appropriate if it satisfies and lies in their comfort zones. If the law will go out of those bounds, that person will feel that the law is unjust for him/her and it is not morally right.
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 68
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Section 2 Analytical Writing Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by 83
- some yound adults want independence from their parents 73
- Every individual in a society has a responsibility to obey just laws and to disobey and resist unjust laws Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...rally appropriate for him if it doesn’t affect with his lifestyle, culture and his views. I...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 498, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...no income tax would be applied on them. According to me, this is not appropriate as the law jus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 344, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'feel'
Suggestion: feel
...ch way that the public of his would not feeling any pinch while paying the taxes. But s...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, look, regarding, so, then, thus, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2223.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 488.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55532786885 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53317149183 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46106557377 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.8268995993 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6842105263 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57894736842 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142256250093 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502915181988 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337580487372 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934057892213 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263250662939 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 48.8420337079 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 12.1639044944 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.