Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future
The citizens of a nation rely on the government for their problems to be solved because it is the government which is well-informed about every aspect of the country and possesses the required resources to tackle every kind of conundrum faced by its people. I feel that by solving the anticipated problems of the tomorrow, can the government solve the problems of today. Its like a game of chess, wherein the player's current move is result of his thinking of several steps ahead.
Let us consider the recent mishap experienced by the migrant workers during the nationwide lockdown. Announcement of the sudden 21-Day Lockdown by our Prime Minister and implementation of stringent measures of keeping people at their homes had indeed helped in declining the number of coronavirus cases in our country, thus solving the problem of the everyday rise in cases and deaths. But, the government had not anticipated the situation of the migrant workers. Providing them with food, shelter and safe transportation facilites was never included in their blueprint. Had the concerned authorities foreseen the worse condition of the migrant workers and made necessary requirements for them, many lives would have been saved. Due to dearth of resources and no transportation facilities, many migrant workers had been crumbled under the wheels of vehicles on the roads and highways.
If a government feels obfuscated about what could happen next , then they can always consult professional Data Scientists, who are specialized in using computer programs, machine learning and mathematical models based on the given data to accurately predict what could happen in the future of a nation. Will the coronavirus cases surge? Which state requires more face masks? How many more beds are required for the COVID-19 patients? The answer to all these questions are with these professionals. This way, the government can act accordingly. It should invest its money to take necessary precautions: to keep its people safe, because it is always health and safety before wealth.
To conclude my essay, I would say that if the government can presage the problems that could arise because of the problems of today, it would be successful in tackling firstly, the current problems and sequentially, the problems anticipated by them.
- Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry In order to stop the erosion we should charge people for using the beaches Although this solution may annoy a few tourists in the short term i 69
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 83
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... obfuscated about what could happen next , then they can always consult profession...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, thus, well, i feel, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1940.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 369.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25745257453 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38284983912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89192220242 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569105691057 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.6631368231 60.3974514979 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.117647059 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7058823529 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259945888745 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07452785422 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135512869156 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175473206902 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117167111987 0.0667264976115 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.