Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
A research field is one where-in various experiments are carried out in order to solve a problem. These problems could be health related, advancement of technology, global development e.t.c. The development of research may take months and perhaps even years to start and complete. The prompt recommends that government set up rules and regulations to bind scientific research and development. In my opinion, I agree with the recommendation for two reasons.
First, before a scientific research can be set up, there need to be a problem in which the researcher is trying to solve. During this period, the researcher must have an hypothesis he/she is trying to prove right or wrong. However, the most driving force for any scientific research is funding. Without funding, no research can be carried out. In cases like this, government needs to place restrictions to avoid 'unnecessary'and even 'irrelevant' works. For instance, there are funding bodies such as NIH that fund various STEM research. These bodies tends to have rules and requirements in place to limit and outsource unrelated research works in order to boost the improvement of health related issues. A typical example is a case of a professor trying to get grants for his/her work. Such a person needs to write a grant proposal and research statement stating what he/she hopes to accomplish with their research work, after which he/she submits it for approval. Upon approval, the research work begins. This methods helps to cater for the need of research while preventing glut of research in a field in with already catholic information.
Furthermore, there are research industries that are based on scientific research. An example is the pharmaceutical company. A pharmaceutical company carries out various research before developing drugs that can target and mitigate various diseases such as Alzheimer, cancer. Such pharmaceutical company upon development of the drugs will go through the testing-phase. Testing of the drug is carried out to know the efficacy and side effect of the drugs, it is done in-vitro and in-vivo. During the in-vivo phase, the drug is tested in animal models such as rat, mice e.t.c. If there are no government restrictions in place, then any capable funding-body can set up an organization for such research regardless of the side effects. In cases like this, government restrictions will ensure that before any drugs can be approved for administration in human, it must meet certain standards and the side effects must be well documented to avoid exacerbating rather than ameliorating the intended health issue.
Of course, it could be argued that restrictions from the government can be bias and perhaps even parochial. Certainly, government does not know how scientific research work, how much dearth information certain field consists of without extensive research carried out on it. But this is exactly why at least few restrictions needs to be put in place, because even researchers are bias in their work. Most of researchers are driven by either active interest in a particular field or even as far as selfish reasons in attaining a certain goal. Without restrictions in place, researchers will go through any length to prove a theory right or wrong, not minding who gets hurt in the process. Without this restrictions, researchers will ignore glaring side effects of drugs and praise it efficient which will act as a detriment to people that ends up getting administered the drugs. In my opinion, government restrictions is important and required in the development of scientific research, but these restrictions should only be the few necessary one in order to yeild the best results possible.
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 83
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee we recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 60
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and sup 66
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...g this period, the researcher must have an hypothesis he/she is trying to prove ri...
^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'tend'.
Suggestion: tend
...und various STEM research. These bodies tends to have rules and requirements in place...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1003, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...pon approval, the research work begins. This methods helps to cater for the need of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1016, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'help'.
Suggestion: help
... the research work begins. This methods helps to cater for the need of research while...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the researchers') or simply say ''Most researchers''.
Suggestion: Most of the researchers; Most researchers
...ven researchers are bias in their work. Most of researchers are driven by either active interest in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 695, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g who gets hurt in the process. Without this restrictions, researchers will ignore g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, at least, for instance, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 94.0 58.6224719101 160% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3101.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 595.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21176470588 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97716754435 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472268907563 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 928.8 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9220005782 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.931034483 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5172413793 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24137931034 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234566885037 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697574879156 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420007133127 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161017422251 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029513980022 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...g this period, the researcher must have an hypothesis he/she is trying to prove ri...
^^
Line 2, column 547, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'tend'.
Suggestion: tend
...und various STEM research. These bodies tends to have rules and requirements in place...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1003, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
...pon approval, the research work begins. This methods helps to cater for the need of ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1016, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'help'.
Suggestion: help
... the research work begins. This methods helps to cater for the need of research while...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 399, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the researchers') or simply say ''Most researchers''.
Suggestion: Most of the researchers; Most researchers
...ven researchers are bias in their work. Most of researchers are driven by either active interest in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 695, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...g who gets hurt in the process. Without this restrictions, researchers will ignore g...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, at least, for instance, of course, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.5258426966 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 94.0 58.6224719101 160% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3101.0 2235.4752809 139% => OK
No of words: 595.0 442.535393258 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21176470588 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.93888872473 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97716754435 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 281.0 215.323595506 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472268907563 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 928.8 704.065955056 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.2370786517 143% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9220005782 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.931034483 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5172413793 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.24137931034 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234566885037 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697574879156 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420007133127 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161017422251 0.150359130593 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029513980022 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.