The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries.
In my opinion, there are many political issues can only be reviewed by our descendants. However, there are many technological achievements can be judged by contemporaries instantly. Thus, I disagree with statement.
Indeed, a few issues can be examined only by our descendants, such as the affects of nuclear energy. For example, in Taiwan, there were many people opposing the government to build new nuclear power plants because these people were concerned about nuclear radiation caused by the power plants. However, the president of Taiwan, Tsai Ing Wen, still decided to establish more nuclear power plants because there were serious problems of shortage of energy in Taiwan. Other types of energy would need to be imported from foreign countries, and thus the Taiwanese people could not obtain stable supplies of energy in the past because of foreign governments' policies. Therefore, in order to get the stable supplies of energy independently, the Taiwanese government chose to more nuclear power plants. The negative effects of nuclear energy may not be detected in a short period, such as nuclear radiation. Thus, the greatness of Tsai Ing Wen can be only judged by the Taiwanese descendants.
However, there are other important events can be judged by contemporaries. For example, Steve Jobs invented the first smartphone in 2007, and this great achievement can be examined by contemporaries apparently. People can obtain lots of useful information by using smartphone’s software applications, such as Google and Yahoo. People do not need to go to a real stores to lend videos because they can use their smartphone to watch many movies on online platforms, such as Youtube and Netflix, by their smartphones. Moreover, people do not have to get into a physical offices to attend meetings as they can use lots of helpful software applications to finish their discussions. With these useful functions, people can finish their works or enjoy a movie more conveniently. Therefore, the greatness of Steve Jogs can be judged by contemporaries.
Moreover, lots of people devoted their time to saving more people, and this greatness of these people could also positive judgements from contemporaries. For example, Alan Turing, who was a British computer scientist, once attended many secret missions of British army. The most famous feat accomplished by him was that he and his colleagues deciphered the communication machine of Nazi Germany, and help allies to defeat Germany in 1945. His achievement could be also reviewed by contemporaries because his actions saved lots of people and liberated those countries occupied by Germany. By contrast, if Alan Turing had not chosen to help the British government to decipher the communication machine of Germany, the allies might have not been able to defeat Germany.
To sum up, some people can only be examined by our descendants. However, There are many great people can still be judged by contemporaries. Therefore, I disagree with the statement.
- Government should offer college and university education free of charge to all students 50
- Is it better to spend money on traveling and vacations or to save money for the future 80
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Getting advice from friends who are older than you is more valuable than getting that from your peers 66
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 568, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'office'?
Suggestion: office
...ople do not have to get into a physical offices to attend meetings as they can use lots...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2535.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30334728033 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00043836483 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453974895397 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 795.6 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.249973545 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.4 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.12 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236991040668 0.243740707755 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795342905301 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658252582319 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148711580616 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0491362143013 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.