The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
It is true that machines have been invented by humans with their knowledge and skill. Humans have invented machines that make life easy. Without humans it wouldn’t be possible to create such inventions. However, as mentioned by the author, it is not always true that humans' minds are always superior to machines, as machines are mere inventions of humans. I partially agree with the author's claim.
For example, robots are one of the finest inventions of humankind. They can be used to perform the tiring and risky tasks. Robots can be used in scavenging works, excavation works which are dangerous to human health and life. However, machines are only tools that are created by humans which performs the tasks that are pre defined or follows the algorithm that has been implemented in it. They are far behind humans in terms of making inventions and thinking innovatively. This can tell us that humans are far superior than machines in terms of their analytical ability.
Also there are multiple situations where the claim can go wrong. Machines can be used to do complex calculations without which it could have taken years for humans to do. Higher order differential equations in Quantum physics can be solved in no time using supercomputers. Accuracy with which supercomputers make these calculations in a short span are unmatchable with human calculations which are prone to a lot of errors usually. So, definitely machines are superior in this type of situation.
In conclusion, the author has made an thoughtful argument about humans and machines but rather than making the argument in a generalized way that “The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds” it can be defined in a more sensible way like, “The Human kind are superior to machines in terms of thinking and analytical ability because machines are only tools of human minds”. Thus, I partially agree with the author's argument.
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 50
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is true that machines have been inven...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 522, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[1]
Message: The adjective superior is normally used with 'to'.
Suggestion: to
...an tell us that humans are far superior than machines in terms of their analytical a...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in terms of their analytical ability. Also there are multiple situat...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...nalytical ability. Also there are multiple situations where the...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re superior in this type of situation. In conclusion, the author has ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 46, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... In conclusion, the author has made an thoughtful argument about humans and ma...
^^
Line 7, column 347, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e Human kind are superior to machines in terms of thinking and analytical ability...
^^
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...inds”. Thus, I partially agree with the authors argument.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08024691358 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71011557201 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 215.323595506 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490740740741 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 87.3016093074 60.3974514979 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4444444444 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371921181583 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110988377881 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0851297829098 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.247479026077 0.150359130593 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765816965124 0.0667264976115 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 100.480337079 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.