It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.
Yes, I completely agrre with the given statement that "It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves". We represent our ourselves in the world with help of social group we are in and follow. Our involvement with other people shows our demenour, status and other pragmatic behavior for society. Depending on our social group some people might judge us.
Having, a good social group helps us identify as an good natured human being to other people. For example, there are two kids named "Kevin" and "David" both are lively and cheerful kids but, the friend circle of both the kids are polar opposite to each other's.
Kevin's friend circle is pragmatic, cheerful, warm just like him. All his friends in the circle are have a very good reputation in society. They try to maintain a very good decorum, give and talk with respect with each other. They all have proper manners and etiquettes which help shape a really good future. Even when some one is scolding even though it is not their fault, they will listen carefully to that person and say "sorry" and move on. All the friends in the circle teach each other to respect each and every human being. They also do volunteering work for those in need. All these qualities shows that how good this group of kevin is. This good natured beahvior would help them in future if they occur to have any problem.
On the other hand, David's social is polar opposite to kevin's. None of his friends have good reputaion all of his frirends have a notorious nature. Neither his friends give respect to each other nor they give it to any elder. All having notorious nature create problem for themselves and people surrounding them. They would bully a kid for no reason making him/her scared of them for life, kevin's social group won't treat everybody condoscendingly they would treat anyone however they want. Kevin's friends are digging their own graves by this attitude and demenour. All teachers scold them everyday but they are not a making bit of progress to put themselves on track of good nurturing.
If any problem occured everybody will point fingers at david because he is one who is having troublesome friend circle. His parents will need to accept this fact.
Humans are like clay we shape ourselves as our surrounding so, having good social group will define ourselves as a good natured person and having bad social-group will scope us as bad natured person. The bad influence will give us only bad qualities making us to be more bitter, evil natured human where as to contrary we will get good qualities and shape us to be more happy, good behviored human. We can take all these qualities from above example of "Kevin" and "David".
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-27 | mei_unavailable | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-03 | zanzendegi | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | tomlee0205 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | Jeyodi | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 54
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves 50
- Educators should find out what students want included in the curriculum and then offer it to them 54
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... good social group helps us identify as an good natured human being to other peopl...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... him. All his friends in the circle are have a very good reputation in society. They...
^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...p shape a really good future. Even when some one is scolding even though it is not their...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 589, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e and demenour. All teachers scold them everyday but they are not a making bit of progre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... parents will need to accept this fact. Humans are like clay we shape ourselves ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 299, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...s to be more bitter, evil natured human where as to contrary we will get good qualities ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90889830508 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68019695618 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489406779661 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6321038195 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8148148148 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4814814815 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7037037037 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248967731306 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763044305034 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145941601202 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152210121597 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219679140627 0.0667264976115 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... good social group helps us identify as an good natured human being to other peopl...
^^
Line 5, column 100, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'had'.
Suggestion: had
... him. All his friends in the circle are have a very good reputation in society. They...
^^^^
Line 5, column 319, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'someone'?
Suggestion: someone
...p shape a really good future. Even when some one is scolding even though it is not their...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 589, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e and demenour. All teachers scold them everyday but they are not a making bit of progre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... parents will need to accept this fact. Humans are like clay we shape ourselves ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 299, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...s to be more bitter, evil natured human where as to contrary we will get good qualities ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, really, so, as to, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 64.0 33.0505617978 194% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2317.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90889830508 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68019695618 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 215.323595506 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489406779661 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 714.6 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6321038195 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8148148148 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4814814815 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7037037037 5.21951772744 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 19.0 10.2758426966 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248967731306 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763044305034 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145941601202 0.0758088955206 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152210121597 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.219679140627 0.0667264976115 329% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 14.1392134831 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.