Claim: Young people's tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills.
Reason: These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than fully and honestly engaging with the people around them.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The auther opined his opinion that. the use of electronic device will have adverse effect on their social skill by reasoning that they will focus more on online relatioship rather than that in reality. Here we will define "social skills" as the ability to keep in touch with old friends and meet new ones. I strongly disagree with this argument and my view is that the development of such teachnologies just enhanced out social skill.
First, and also most importantly, the use of portable device makes social connection more accessible, and therefore enhanced our social skill. Before those devices are created, people need to communicate face to face or through mail, which is extremely inconvenient and takes spate of time. Old friends are easily to get disconnected when people moving to another place. However, it cames much easier for nowadays as people could always keep in touch using Internet. Therefore, the existence of portable devices actually augments out social skills.
On the other hand, Portable devices provide young people chance to meet more diversified firends so that they need to learn how to communicate with people from different background. With access to a more diversified world, teenagers could have much greater chance to meet people from differnet region, racial, and even country, and they will realize the differnece among people. For instance, some manners treated as polite in one culture may be seen as offensive in another culture, and learning this is rather salubrious for social skill development. Therefore it would be beneficent to use portable device for developting social skill.
However, there is still a very smaller group of people used those devices as the author claimed that they only focused on their artificial personality, but that is becuase they misused such technology. Furthermore, they are only a diminutive part of young people, while most benefit from the advantages of portable devices. Thus the claim that using portable device would have adverse effect in interpersonal skills would be too categorical, ignoring the positive ramification it brings for the majority.
In conclusion, younger generations get positive oucome in using portable devices by obtaining a more accessible approach for a more diversified social activities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-11 | graceeehgq | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | tomlee0205 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | TiOluwani97 | 81 | view |
| 2023-07-28 | Umaima Khan | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | s.sim | 54 | view |
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position 66
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the mayor of Wistfold A recent study revealed that the number of children requiring medical attention for illnesses in our town is 40 percent higher than in the neighboring town of Champsfield Last year the Cham 60
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 66
- The following is a letter to the editor of an environmental magazine In 1975 a wildlife census found that there were seven species of amphibians in Xanadu National Park with abundant numbers of each species However in 2002 only four species of amphibians 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
The auther opined his opinion that. the use of electronic device will have adve...
^^^
Line 5, column 554, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...alubrious for social skill development. Therefore it would be beneficent to use portable ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 325, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rom the advantages of portable devices. Thus the claim that using portable device wo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1954.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38292011019 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77002964353 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 624.6 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2460696918 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.941176471 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292646078052 0.243740707755 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0970534955849 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683521579361 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16618478648 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323064557991 0.0667264976115 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.