The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
Luxury items have become necessary in daily lives of people, but it degrades development of individuals to a certain extent, as they tend to become more dependent on convenience providing items. So I partially disagree with the given statement.
The more luxuries the people are offered with, the more they become accustomed to comfort zone. Due to this comforting nature, people tend to become lazy and procastinate even for the simplest of tasks. For example, when a person starts to ride a scooter on city roads, he would use that scooter even for short distance travelling, avoiding few minutes of walk. If the scooter is made unavailable to such a person, he would procastinate to do the same task, as now he would be required to take a walk. So the point is clear that with more luxury stuff, people tend to become more lazy.
People tend to rely on luxury items to a large degree, even if the task can be completed without them. As the number of luxury items in our daily life increases, people tend to forget that some tasks can be completed only with human intervention. For instance, people tend to use calculators for doing complex calculations but now-a-days people use them even for doing simplest of calculations such as "three times three", which can be performed manually even by a third grade student. Thus people should not lean so much to the luxuries that they become completely dependent on them.
Luxuriy items might prove helpful in daily lives for accomplishing harder tasks in a simple manner. With the help of the convenience provided by the luxury items, people can easily simplify a task. Mobile phone is a luxury item which if used wisely provides a greater ease of communication. People can communicate with each other living miles apart instantly, and even at a cost effective expense. Items like this clearly makes people's lives more easier and a hassle-free experience.
Therefore we can conclude that luxury items may prove to deteriorate independence of individuals, but if used modestly can also prove to be convenient in daily lives of individuals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y disagree with the given statement. The more luxuries the people are offered...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ff, people tend to become more lazy. People tend to rely on luxury items to a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...become completely dependent on them. Luxuriy items might prove helpful in dai...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 86, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple manner" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ly lives for accomplishing harder tasks in a simple manner. With the help of the convenience provi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...sk. Mobile phone is a luxury item which if used wisely provides a greater ease of ...
^^
Line 7, column 448, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'easier' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: easier
...s like this clearly makes peoples lives more easier and a hassle-free experience. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...easier and a hassle-free experience. Therefore we can conclude that luxury it...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 6, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...r and a hassle-free experience. Therefore we can conclude that luxury items may p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, third, thus, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 353.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9716713881 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77896030135 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521246458924 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9319009432 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.235294118 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7647058824 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.82352941176 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155284883879 0.243740707755 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594616609339 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044812951592 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953877265686 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189997730898 0.0667264976115 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.