Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I mostly disagree with the prompt that many of the discoveries were not the result of constant research work and were accidental with the following two reasons.
Firstly, We cannot simply generalize by considering a few of the innovation that might be a result of any accident but in many of the scenarios it requires a lot of research and hardwork in a unified direction to reach to a conclusion or to discover something. For instance, the apple fell on Newton’s head accidently but to discover the gravitational force he had relentlessly worked for many years to prove his discovery to the world.
Further, The curiosity of something might be accidental but to create something we need to follow some kind of defined procedure which might include various experiments. For example, if we consider the invention of bulb, the inventor of bulb failed almost 10,000 times before discovering the bulb.
However, In some of the situation a particular creation might be an accidental, even in that scenarios most of the times it is a bi-product of the original invention. Like if we consider the journey of discord, earlier the founder tried to make a gaming application but it didn’t work, So they have diverted to the messaging app which was a huge success for the team and resulted in providing an amazing application to the world.
In Conclusion, To create something it always require to work in a direction to get a desired result that is either it will end up to a failure or it will led to a discovery.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
| 2023-01-06 | wwwqaq111 | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...fore discovering the bulb. However, In some of the situation a particular creation might b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oduct of the original invention. Like if we consider the journey of discord, earl...
^^
Line 6, column 46, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'requires'?
Suggestion: requires
...nclusion, To create something it always require to work in a direction to get a desired...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 54, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'working'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: working
..., To create something it always require to work in a direction to get a desired result ...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 155, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
... it will end up to a failure or it will led to a discovery.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 2235.4752809 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 261.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80842911877 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92123421054 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 215.323595506 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 20.2370786517 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8296778845 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.875 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.625 23.4991977007 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.21951772744 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107975906697 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461632750682 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383864635882 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599097733827 0.150359130593 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421547161734 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 14.1392134831 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 48.8420337079 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 100.480337079 63% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.