Mass media and the internet have caused people s attention spans to get shorter However the overall effect has been positive while people are less able to focus on one thing they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quan

Essay topics:

Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large quantities of information and find what’s important.

The media is a platform that connects ideas, people, businesses from different regions, countries and continents round the globe. It is a very powerful platform as it divulges a lot of information; some which are facts, some are factitious, and others speculations.

However, the internet contains a lot of resourceful information about different things happening globally. One can get abreast with things happening in a country while being in another country via the internet. Communication between people in different parts of the world has been made easy via internet; conference meetings can be held with a group of people at different locations via the use of internet. The internet is also used for security purposes. It can be used to track a person's mobile phone and in a situation of emergency track the person's location. There is a lot that is accrued to the media.

In as much as the internet has a positive influence globally, it also has its negative influence on the users. The internet contains a lot of information that are very distracting. There are things that trend at this moment and before the end of the day, another news is made to trend. A lot of people get carried away with frivolous things on the internet. In recent times, some companies have begun to give strict restrictions with the use of phones during office hours. Some tasks are sometimes prolonged and delivered at the peak of submission or after the due period, this is because of mobile distractions from the media. The media can also be addictive, a lot of people get addicted to posting things on social media and some await posts from other people.

It is out rightly true that the internet has caused people's attention span to get shorter because of the large chunk of information. But I would beg to differ that this also has helped people select useful information from the bulk of information. Once I type in a word on 'google', I get more than one response from different sites and then I have the luxury of clicking the best.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-19 Adesina Boluwatito 58 view
2022-11-03 haemanth10 66 view
2022-10-05 asm01 58 view
2022-09-30 anil paltya view
2022-07-09 sally_tt 66 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Banke :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 11, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
The media is a platform that connects ideas, people,...
^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a person' or simply 'persons'?
Suggestion: a person; persons
...urity purposes. It can be used to track a persons mobile phone and in a situation of emer...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...d in a situation of emergency track the persons location. There is a lot that is accrue...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, then, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 2235.4752809 75% => OK
No of words: 350.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80285714286 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72147768985 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491428571429 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0512752125 60.3974514979 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.3888888889 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4444444444 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.16666666667 5.21951772744 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234182410395 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766061501769 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678894338029 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136910395186 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0745312466485 0.0667264976115 112% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.