A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The author asserts that every student has to learn in the same subjects and courses before entering university. This may sound persuasive because this teaching method can imbue students similar-level intelligence and offer them a variety of studying experience. However, it may not always be required, especially students who already found their interest or who cannot easily follow the school's curriculum schedule. In this essay, I will give several reasons why the author's assertion may not be applicable to every case.
Admittedly, implementing national curriculum throughout nationwide would help students to grow and cultivate their knowledge interdisciplinary. To be specific, current society is growing revolutionary through convergence, which means combinations between multi-studies. For example, Steve Jobs, the co-founder of the Apple, did not study only computer or marketing. He had background knowledge in multi-fields such as philosophy, letter designing, and also computers. This implies that if students can get a chance to study the same curriculum, which is designed to teach them at least average, they can choose their major with a more open view and mind. The government is able to offer students similar chances to study and guarantee the experience of various subjects.
However, even the same national curriculum can show students a lot of ways to go, it does not always give them an effective way to study. This is due to the fact that every individual has different talents. Specifically, students who determined their major and future jobs would not want to waste their time by studying irrelevant subjects. For example, a student who has played the guitar since 5 years old will not acquire any meaningful knowledge from studying science subjects such as biology or chemistry. For them, individual and specified education will be much more effective and useful. Also, there will be several students who need much higher level education. If a nation offers them only similar-average level curriculum, their talents will not get a chance to be developed in earlier period. For those students, same national curriculum system may not benefit in any way.
In conclusion, a nation should implement a balanced approach. For students who have not determined their future careers, same national curriculum can bring the best chance to learn diverse studies. Also, several ingenius students need to be taught in specially designed curriculum which can develop their personal strengths in effective ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...nterest or who cannot easily follow the schools curriculum schedule. In this essay, I w...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...ay, I will give several reasons why the authors assertion may not be applicable to ever...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, as to, at least, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46173469388 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95378532052 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.2701441886 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.952380952 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.80952380952 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253111468737 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808439613851 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645937890404 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170577980427 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04108295295 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.