A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The recommendation that students should all study the same national curriculum until they enter college seems reasonable albeit not without some fault in its over-simplification.
Students need to acquire some common knowledge to be successful contributors in the society. They will have better understanding of their environment and how their desired specialisation area could potentially have an impact.
While early specialisation may seem to provide more efficient operation of a nation, some people don't know what they would like to do or become until later in life. I am sure a lot of people today have their "I want to be a neurosurgeon or aeronautic engineer" phase when they were kids but it won't be surprising looking them up now and finding out that they are detectives or underwater welder - fields not even close to their early ambitions.
The truth is, there is no guarantee in life. As such it will be better if every student is empower with the skills they need to easily pivot, should they choose to, into other areas they may be interested in later life. Take for instance a mechanical engineer transitioning into a software developer due to programming skills they have already acquired from having similar curriculum to other students berfore college.
Finally, while the recommendation sounds good, it may be costlier for the nation to implement in that such a nation will expend more capital providing a wider array of similar study resources to all students compared to another nation who only provides resources tailored to a specialisation for a set a student at a time.
In conclusion, having all students study the same national curriculum is not all bad, however, it is not a "one size fit all world", so attention should be given to aberrant cases such as when students already have their careers set out from an early age, are greatly talented in a field and very poor in others, or have strong passion or dislike for another field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ient operation of a nation, some people dont know what they would like to do or beco...
^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'empowered'.
Suggestion: empowered
...h it will be better if every student is empower with the skills they need to easily piv...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 106, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ulum is not all bad, however, it is not a 'one size fit all world', so ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, may, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 329.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04863221884 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97718443851 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.1360789924 60.3974514979 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.1 118.986275619 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.9 23.4991977007 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 5.21951772744 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235121796675 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100637033031 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106697303562 0.0758088955206 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148438462142 0.150359130593 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113261557423 0.0667264976115 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.