A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college

I agree with the given statement asserts that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national cirriculum until they enter college. The arguments which will justify my stand are as follows:

Firstly, the time before college, when a student is studying at a school, private tutions or through any other medium, is the most important formatory period in the life of a student. This is the time when their knowledge, aptitude, intelligence and working skills are developed which goes on to be with them in every walk of their lives. Hence, the content that is being taught to the students during this time becomes of vital importance. The practice of adapting a national cirriculum by a nation and requiring all its students to study it introduces a sense of uniformity in education during these rudimentary years of students' lives, thus leading to a sense of cooperation among them. Since students, gathering knowledge from different sources before college, will have to study a common syllabus, it becomes easier for them to discuss on their study topics with their friends who might be from a different school. In this way, all the students studying in a nation can help each out. It seeds a sense of compainionship among students, a sense of relief that they are not alone in this and can reach out to their friends whenever needed. Thus, it ultimately eliminates the fear of getting lost and helps the students to focus on studies better.

Secondly, until the time to enter into a college comes, students are too naive and unaware of their own strengths and interest to make a calculated decision as to what they should study at school. Apart from that, even if a student is aware of their interest, it would not help them to straightway dive deep into their relevant subjects without having learnt the basics of language, science, maths, social studies or arts. As the popular proverb goes, 'Try to be the jack of all trades and master of one'. Pre college is the best time for a student to explore every topic/subject that is present out there, analyse their strengths and interest and then make a informed decision as to what domain/major do they want to pursue in college. In this way, they would have all the general knowledge required to live in the real world and also successfully major in their specialised domain once they graduate from the college. Hence, it only makes more sense for experienced academics to formulate an appropriate uniform syllabus for all the pre college students in a nation that would help them to gain a generalised knowledge of every relevant topics and prepare them for the real world.

Finally, after school, the students of a natuon generally try to get into the best colleges that their country has to offer. If the cirriculum was different, the entrance test to decide the merit of students would no longer be fair. In order to justify it, authorities will have to design separate tests depending on the diverse syllabus studied by various students, thus making the complete college entrance process very inefficient. Thus, if a nation has a uniform cirriculum, it would make the entrance exams more streamlined.

Therefore, to conclude, while a nation should try to keep their syllabus up to date so that its students are well aware of the world events, it should definitely require all of its students to study the same national cirriculum until they enter college.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 657, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ir strengths and interest and then make a informed decision as to what domain/maj...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, as to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.6327345309 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 13.6137724551 95% => OK
Pronoun: 54.0 28.8173652695 187% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 97.0 55.5748502994 175% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 16.3942115768 49% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2857.0 2260.96107784 126% => OK
No of words: 586.0 441.139720559 133% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87542662116 5.12650576532 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.92010537223 4.56307096286 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60463060182 2.78398813304 94% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 204.123752495 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460750853242 0.468620217663 98% => OK
syllable_count: 900.9 705.55239521 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.96107784431 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 2.70958083832 332% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.22255489022 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 19.7664670659 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.8473053892 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.722802871 57.8364921388 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.85 119.503703932 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3 23.324526521 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85 5.70786347227 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.20758483034 183% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 6.88822355289 15% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.418689812445 0.218282227539 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143490042422 0.0743258471296 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163803029433 0.0701772020484 233% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.325916348588 0.128457276422 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.164113535088 0.0628817314937 261% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.3799401198 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 48.3550499002 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.197005988 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 12.5979740519 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.32208582834 99% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 98.500998004 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.1389221557 122% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.9071856287 118% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.