A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The educational issue may be the controversial topic to be discussed. Some think that students should learn all same curriculums before going to colleges, while the others disagree to the perspective. In my opinion, I partly agree that they should take the same national courses before universities.
Positively, courses taught in high schools and junior high schools are the basic knowledge that everyone should know and can help students to narrow the gap between different levels of knowledge in high schools and colleges. For instance, mathematics, which is the most basic tool that would use in classes in colleges: engineering mathematics, financial analysis, or business management. Additionally, English, except for those countries that English is their native language, students in most countries should learn English before going to universities. After studying in colleges, all books, and papers will become English, and if they didn't build English reading ability in high schools, it will become a significant problem for them to keep in line with the contents in classes and their classmates. In short, If students lost their chances to study those kinds of the same curriculum before colleges that will create obstacles for them.
On the other hand, however, some students are not good at studying those courses like math or English inherently, but they are well done at photography, art, dancing. In this situation, they should not be forced to learn the same courses with others; they should broaden and improve their abilities from children.
All in all, in my opinion, most students should learn the same knowledge before colleges, but the others having those particular skills are not suitable to be treated in the same rule.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | BRUHATHI2 | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 640, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...papers will become English, and if they didnt build English reading ability in high s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, well, while, except for, for instance, in short, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1476.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 278.0 442.535393258 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30935251799 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71572966616 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 215.323595506 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525179856115 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 704.065955056 62% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7764338166 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.181818182 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 23.4991977007 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 5.21951772744 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264394314368 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107176946751 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0776864342211 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179863441019 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456654682741 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 100.480337079 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.