A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The claim suggests that all student should study the name national curriculum before they go to college. Plausible as it may seem at a glance, given that a national standardized schooling system might be more effecive than a diversed one. However, such recommendation fails to acknowledge that education is not only about standardization that put every student into the exact same framework, but also leading to become who they want to be. So I do not fully agree with this recommendation based on the reason that diversity should be repected and appreciated.
Amdittedly, the exact same course designs do have some good as it provides clear standards for college to evaluate the students' academic achievement so that they can make decisions whether to enroll them based on their scores. Nevertheless, scroes do not necessarily represent every aspect of a student. On the contray, in countries where scores take the most important part considering college enrollment, like South Korea, China, Japan and Singapore, the nationwide standardized college examination has put overwelmed academic pressure not only the students but also on their parents who pay the tuision fees plus extra fees for outside-school tutorship.
Besides, all students learn same lessons would limit their own choices for their academic goals in higher education. For example, a student who wants to learn physics science at university might like learning more math and physics classes at high school so that he or she can be better prepared, while a student who wishes to choose English language as his or her major is more likely to take more writing classes. If all students are forced to take the same courses, how can they be evaluted in the same bank score requriment? Do the final scores they get can comprehensively show what how potential in thier dream majors?
In sum, same national curriculum might do some good as the standard is clear and solid. However, getting students to learn the same lessons would strongly ignore the diversity of students' academic choices, leaving them little space to show their talents if they can not choose their own classes of interest to prepare for colleges.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- Young people enjoy life more than the older peoper do 65
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain y 66
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaints 52
- rofessors are normally found in university classrooms, offices, and libraries doing research and lecturing to their students. More and more, however, they also appear as guests on television news programs, giving expert commentary on the latest events in 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 24, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The claim suggests that all student should study the name nation...
^^
Line 1, column 460, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e who they want to be. So I do not fully agree with this recommendation based on ...
^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ege enrollment, like South Korea, China, Japan and Singapore, the nationwide stan...
^^
Line 9, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h school so that he or she can be better prepared, while a student who wishes to ...
^^
Line 13, column 42, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n sum, same national curriculum might do some good as the standard is clear and s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1835.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15449438202 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7768882099 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564606741573 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.3234708305 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.153846154 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3846153846 23.4991977007 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259803895228 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109011180649 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0952019724941 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167497285598 0.150359130593 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530520192502 0.0667264976115 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.