A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
The topic raises a controversial topic issue of whether students of a nation should be required to study the same national Curriculum before they cross to college. Indisputable, not studying the same curriculum will increase the exposure of some students. Nevertheless, uniformity in curriculum will make competition among the students easily assessed. Thus, I generally would agree with the opinion that students in high school should be taught with same lesson outline. To further bolster my viewpoint, I would illustrate in subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, it will make competition asssesment unbiased. I would like to point out that the essence of the uniformity in National curriculum; to illustrate , let's look at the example of students from 3 different schools, who are preparing University of Ohio entrance exam. In this circumstance, obviously the students of one school will be favoured more than others if there's no uniformity in syllabus. Consequently, it is pretty obvious that students should study with uniform syllabus.
Furthermore, it would be a problem for the University of Ohio mentioned above, when it comes to administering and setting of entrance exam questions. As they would not know the particular areas that they should focus their entrance exam questions. Hence, all the above evidences demonstrate the importance of the uniformity of the national curriculum.
Admittedly, one would argue that it would help student know more. This is true especially when it comes to a senerio where the high school curriculum is comparable with college first and second year syllabi. However, the above argument doesn't constitute a sufficient support to claim that. Because students might even find it hard to study using such curriculum.
In conclusion, uniform national curriculum is advantageous at large to both the students and the nation. Hence, should be adopted.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...exposure of some students. Nevertheless, uniformity in curriculum will make compe...
^^
Line 3, column 154, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ty in National curriculum; to illustrate , lets look at the example of students fr...
^^
Line 3, column 368, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: there's
...ol will be favoured more than others if theres no uniformity in syllabus. Consequently...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and setting of entrance exam questions. As they would not know the particular area...
^^
Line 7, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ar syllabi. However, the above argument doesnt constitute a sufficient support to clai...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ute a sufficient support to claim that. Because students might even find it hard to stu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 293.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47440273038 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0094180149 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549488054608 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9639886531 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1111111111 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.21951772744 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35607985072 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108223133604 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103812116395 0.0758088955206 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208320976447 0.150359130593 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867446268657 0.0667264976115 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.