In order for any work of art — for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song — to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
The question of whether a work of art, be it a film, novel or poem must be understandable to most of the people to have merit is a very complex and subjective matter. For broader appreciation of arts, accessibility is a crucial requirement but establishing equity between merit and the understandability of art by broader audience oversimplifies the diversity of arts.
First and foremost, a work of art is a medium of communication through which artists express their emotions and thoughts. It is obviously important that the work of an artist is understood by most of the people as it can connect people from diverse backgrounds through commonality in cultures. For example, the novels or films on romances or family relations has a great impact on making people understand the cultures of different parts of the world and form a connection between diverse cultures.
However, understanding the art is necessary but there can be some works which are made to challenge the accepted notions or put forward new ideas. Such works can not be understood by most of the people but it does not mean that the work has no merit. For instance, there are many poems or novels that have introduced revolutionary ideas but understood by people much later than it was produced. There can be diverse opinions about a single work, so connecting the merit of an artform with understanding of that is a bit much.
Furthermore, A variety of artworks are present that require prior knowledge to understand them such as musics have variety of forms that are likable by different groups of people and it do not reduce the merit of the artwork. Even if an art is accesible by broad audience, it can be difficult for the artist to make his work understandable to all if the audience has not the prior knowledge required.
In conclusion, art should be accesible and understood by broad audience as it helps to extend people's boundary of thoughts. But linking the art's merit to people understandability is very oversimplified notion as the art is a very diverse field. Ultimately, the work's merit should be accessed based on it's ability to provoke emotion and opinions though it is understood by a smaller audience.
- Claim It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Reason The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree o 66
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: Whether; The question whether
The question of whether a work of art, be it a film, novel or p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cessibility is a crucial requirement but establishing equity between merit and th...
^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...le by different groups of people and it do not reduce the merit of the artwork. Ev...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1824.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89008042895 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06061498737 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471849865952 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1393726496 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 130.285714286 118.986275619 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.4457612023 0.243740707755 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164583344916 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097100029802 0.0758088955206 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27089634702 0.150359130593 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0948043444214 0.0667264976115 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.