As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Technological advancement has always been a debatable subject with both pros and cons. With greater technological advancement taking place everyday, and directly impacting people's lives, people's reliance on technology for their everyday lives has naturally shot up. People today have started to depend on technology even for simple tasks. For example, applications like Siri, Google Now has provided people with simpler options and automatic features to do stuff they would have to otherwise manually have to do. While this is definitely a great benefit for people in general, people might just start to forget the way these things are normally done at some point in the future. People may start to depend on technology even for simple tasks which they could do today by themselves and this shift from reliance to dependence could be quite harmful on people's lives.
However if we could take a more balanced approach and use newer and newer technology only at the right place, we may not remain dependent on technology to solve problems. Newer technology is always invented to help people in their daily lives. More technology is synonymous to more progress. Technology get adopted by people when it saves their time or energy or brings in some extra convenience than what they had earlier. With newer technology people can save up their time to do more productive things than what they earlier had to do. This means that humans could still be the same and have similar thoughts despite technological advancement.
Advancement in technologies can in fact improve scope for further technological advancement and thus make humans more productive. Thus humans ability to think might improve with technological advancement. Better technology might as well be conducive to humans ability to think than the gadgets we have today. With any improvement in technology all human values and the ability to humans to perform the tasks they do now could remain the same. Thus any improvement in technology shall only help the human race further and not create an obstacle at any stage.
Throughout history technological advancement has always played the key role in the development of any society or nation. Any society which is more technologically advanced than the other has a key advantage over the other. Thus improvement in technology shall only help in boosting further thoughts and the overall ability to think in humans.
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 89
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 66
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
... technological advancement taking place everyday, and directly impacting peoples lives, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...d be quite harmful on peoples lives. However if we could take a more balanced approa...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...t and thus make humans more productive. Thus humans ability to think might improve w...
^^^^
Line 5, column 136, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... thus make humans more productive. Thus humans ability to think might improve with tec...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...asks they do now could remain the same. Thus any improvement in technology shall onl...
^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...her has a key advantage over the other. Thus improvement in technology shall only he...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, while, for example, in fact, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2034.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 392.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1887755102 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76742802091 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4214783682 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.7 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241469470192 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916639402736 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452023515758 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154692847058 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213039704483 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.