People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision-makers.
__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.
Making decision smartly and to assess what is beneficial for only distinctly separates humans from other living species. The ability and intuition to make the best decision are the factors that make humans the most intellectual species on the Earth. Along with the ability to make smart decisions, we humans are also very emotionally driven. We take make steps in our life that are mostly driven by emotion rather than pure intellectual thinking. When emotionally driven we tend to lose the sense of assessing whether the decision would be feasible or the best and that is clearly not a sign of a strong decision-maker. Thus many times people make emotionally driven decisions and when they realise that the decision was not smart they tend to justify their point by making some faulty logic, which shows their lack of making strong decisions. This kind of the people are the ones who we call poor decision-makers in our society.
The ability to make considerable decisions which will be beneficial according to the situations on hand is much needed in every human being. There are numerous examples of successful people who have achieved many things in their lives only by making strong and feasible decisions at the correct time. They don't take decisions which are emotionally driven, because they know how risky and jeopardizing it could be for them. This kind of smart decision-makers generally don't have egoist nature in them which leads to thinking that the decision made by them are always correct. It has been observed that the people who take emotional decision and who afterwards support that with some logic to make their stand are egoistic in nature.
If some of our great leaders/politicians who are governing our nations make an emotionally driven decision then their consequences could be severe and it's effect would be on the whole nation. For an example, if any nation starts some conflict with their enemy nations and if our leaders would take decision emotionally then it's consequence could be war and the suffering would be faced by all the residents of the nation. Another example, seeing your friend joining the army would be a sign of emotional decision. Just by imitating our beloved ones and following their footsteps would sometimes create a bad situation for us. The great leaders of world have reached these high posts only by making many strong decisions and working towards them rather than making an emotionally-driven decision.
Thus by this, it is justified that the emotionally driven decision-maker is a poor decision-maker and he/she would not be an ideal role model to anyone because of their egoist nature and lack of taking a considerable decision at the appropriate time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | vishva24 | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 621, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... not a sign of a strong decision-maker. Thus many times people make emotionally driv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ble decisions at the correct time. They dont take decisions which are emotionally dr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...kind of smart decision-makers generally dont have egoist nature in them which leads ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...king an emotionally-driven decision. Thus by this, it is justified that the emoti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, thus, kind of, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2271.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04666666667 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79794368937 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.934272128 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.166666667 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.61111111111 5.21951772744 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407715203325 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155115107761 0.0831039109588 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0706533365692 0.0758088955206 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.286357587056 0.150359130593 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0606949455507 0.0667264976115 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.