People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

Making decision smartly and to assess what is beneficial for only distinctly separates humans from other living species. The ability and intuition to make the best decision are the factors that make humans the most intellectual species on the Earth. Along with the ability to make smart-decisions, we humans are also very emotionally driven. We take make steps in our life that are mostly driven by emotion rather than pure intellectual thinking. When emotionally driven we tend to lose the sense of assessing whether the decision would be feasible or the best and that is clearly not a sign of an strong decision-maker. Thus many times people make emotionally driven decisions and when they realise that the decision was not smart they tend to jusitfy their point by making some faulty logic, which shows their lack of making strong decisions. These kiind of the people are the ones who we call poor decision makers in our society.

The ability to make considerable decisions which will be beneficial according the situations on hand is much needed in every human being.There are numerous examples of successfull people who have achieved many things in their lifes only by making strong and feasible decisions at correct time. They don't take decisions which are emotionally driven, because they know how risky and jeopardizing it could be for them. These kind of smart decision makers generally don't have egoist nature in them which leads to think that the decision made by them are always correct. It has been observed that the people who take emotional decision and who afterwards support that with some logic to make their stand are egoistic in nature.

If some of our great leaders/politicians who are governing our nations make emotionally driven decision then their consequences could be severe and it's effect would be on the whole nation. For an example, if any nation start some conflict with their enemy nations and if our leaders would take decision emotionally then it's consequence could be war and the suffering would be faced by all the residents of the nation. Another example, seeing your friend joining the army would be sign of emotional decision.Just by imitating our beloved ones and following their footsteps would sometimes create a bad situation for us. The great leaders of world have reached these high posts only by making many strong decisions and working towards them rather than making emotionally driven decision.

Thus by this it is justified that the emotionally driven decision maker is a poor decision maker and he/she would not be an ideal role model to anyone because of their egoist nature and lack of taking considerable decision at appropriate time.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-09 Truss 50 view
2023-10-04 Adesina Boluwatito 50 view
2023-10-01 shamika@25 50 view
2023-09-14 RIYA MODI 58 view
2023-08-26 vishva24 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Druv777 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 596, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... best and that is clearly not a sign of an strong decision-maker. Thus many times ...
^^
Line 1, column 622, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...not a sign of an strong decision-maker. Thus many times people make emotionally driv...
^^^^
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...and is much needed in every human being.There are numerous examples of successfull pe...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...easible decisions at correct time. They dont take decisions which are emotionally dr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 417, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'These kinds'?
Suggestion: This kind; These kinds
... and jeopardizing it could be for them. These kind of smart decision makers generally dont...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...kind of smart decision makers generally dont have egoist nature in them which leads ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 508, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Just
...rmy would be sign of emotional decision.Just by imitating our beloved ones and foll...
^^^^
Line 5, column 542, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ision.Just by imitating our beloved ones and following their footsteps would some...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... making emotionally driven decision. Thus by this it is justified that the emotio...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, thus, kind of, on the whole

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2253.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 445.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06292134831 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59293186426 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66876427201 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460674157303 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.9 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3252439485 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.8125 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8125 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9375 5.21951772744 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.406185606036 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164642228212 0.0831039109588 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679505764805 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.284286997087 0.150359130593 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573795844169 0.0667264976115 86% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.