People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the

Essay topics:

People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.

__________
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to decide whether the recommendation is likely to have the predicted result. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the recommendation.

A few questions that come to mind in order to determine whether someone who makes decisions based on emotion and justifies them with logic is a poor decision maker are as follows -

What are the emotions under which the individual is making the decision and to what degree are they feeling said emotions? It is important to ask this question because the emotions felt by an individual are important factors which influence decision making but if they are felt in excess and then guide the decisions it is likely that they haven't thought about it even a little bit which could mean that they are indeed poor at making decisions. For example, when a decision is made purely out of anger it can result in serious harm not only to others but oneself but a decision simply guided by slight anger could result in one standing up for oneself in certain situations. Secondly, what is the context in which the decision is being made? This could help determine whether the emotions were justified helping us understand and define when the emotions felt are 'excessive'.

What is their goal when they are justifying the decisions with logic later on? Is it to convince themselves or others? Many a times, gut feelings can guide the individuals decision but it is hard to convince others about the decision just on the basis of that feeling. Therefore, rationalizing the decision could help convince others, whether they are stakeholders or not about it. If the logic is being used to convince themselves, it would be important to evaluate how far are they going in terms of reasoning out their decision. Solid logic could help affirm to themselves that the decision they have made makes sense whereas making leaps and bounds simply to justify their choice would imply whether they are poor decision makers.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-30 yixova3193 66 view
2023-10-09 Truss 50 view
2023-10-04 Adesina Boluwatito 50 view
2023-10-01 shamika@25 50 view
2023-09-14 RIYA MODI 58 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s a poor decision maker are as follows - What are the emotions under which the in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: haven't
...de the decisions it is likely that they havent thought about it even a little bit whic...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 372, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...hat they havent thought about it even a little bit which could mean that they are indeed p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a time' or simply 'times'?
Suggestion: a time; times
... to convince themselves or others? Many a times, gut feelings can guide the individuals...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 308.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84090909091 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46893965327 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 215.323595506 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493506493506 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.3675667313 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.545454545 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405987216363 0.243740707755 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170190729602 0.0831039109588 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118390483068 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.327690899904 0.150359130593 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642348974417 0.0667264976115 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.8971910112 223% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.